Skip to content

· Public charity

Community Health Aide Services Inc

To provide comprehensive at home services to enhance our clients and their families' lives.

$934k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$165k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$4.8MHuman Services$876kMembership Benefit$531kCrime & Legal$175kHealth$90kPhilanthropy$50kEducation$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 23 grants below total $901,050, the rows itemized in this filing. The $934,090 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $33,040 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $313k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $560k
$24,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$45M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UTA OF KJ$165,000
TZEDUKAS HUIR INC$95,000
CONGREGATION YOTZER OHR INC$92,000
THE EVERFUND INC$91,500
CONGREGATION YETEV LEV DSATMAR OF KIRYAS JOEL INC$60,750
CONGREGATION YITEV LAV DERETZ YISROEL$56,000
CONG MESIVTA$48,000
PAILE YOEDZ$35,000
ZICHRON TZVI$28,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF RIMANOV INC$26,000
CONGREGATION DERECH HATORAH$24,800
CONGREGATION DIVREI SIMCHE OF MONROE$24,000
KOLEL AVREICHEM OF KIRYAS JOEL$23,000
UNITED TALMUDICAL ACADEMY OF BORO PARK$22,000
CONGREGATION SATMAR OF LAKEWOOD INC$22,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $161k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF RIMANOV INC: $26k → 14%NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH CHARITIE: $15k → 14%TZEDUKAS HUIR INC: $95k → 20%TZEDUKAS HUIR INC: $25k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.5M · 19 repeat orgs$2.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
29

Total granted

$4.5M
$1.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
0%

Still filing today

26%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $348k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionPhilanthropyMembership BenefitHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    TZEDUKAS HUIR INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $120k · revenue +26%
  • RH
    REFUAH HELPLINE INCDBA REFUAH RESOURCES
    2× · 2018–2023 · $55k · revenue +116%
  • RC
    ROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC
    2× · 2018–2024 · $35k · revenue +122%

Funded once

  • CA
    CONGREGATION AVNEI ZEDEK
    one grant, 2019 · $330k
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BETH ARYEH
    one grant, 2019 · $200k
  • UO
    UTA OF KIRYAS JOEL
    one grant, 2018 · $168k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Taharusam Inc

To promote authentic orthodox judaisim by helping fund jewish causes worldwide.

Philanthropy
2
Chevra-Kadisha Yerushalayim Inc

To facilitate traditional religious burial for those of the orthodox jewish faith in accordance with the ancient jewish custom of being buried on israeli soil by arranging for the resale of burial plots in israeli cemeteries and providing…

Philanthropy
3
Keren Hayeshivot Fund Inc

Keren hayeshivot fund supports religious institutions of higher education in the united states and israel to raise the level of torah and halachic observance in the sephardic orthodox jewish community.

Philanthropy
4
Zichron Meshilem Feish Inc

Provides finacial assistance to needy individuals and to religious, charitable organizations

—
5
Zera Koidesh Inc

To award financial grants to religios orthodox jewish organizations and to help by financial means, the needy, sick and disabled people.

—
6
Ahavat Yisroel Humanity Inc

The organization was formed to award financial grants and/or loans free of interest, to religious orthodox jewish organizations and individuals who are in distress and need financial relief.

Human Services
7
Yeshivah Beth Israel Tifereth Menachem Foundation

To provide support to jewish religious education in israel and around the world, and provide financial assistance to and on behalf of yeshivah beth israel tifereth menachem.

Education
8
Tzidkus Avrohom Beinish Inc

To benefit needy individuals and their families; to promote, foster, increase and advance the health, welfare and economic status of low income families.

Philanthropy
9
Yedidim Usa Inc

Helping jewish community with rent, utilities, repairs, ect.

Human Services
10
Congregation Kollel Tiferes Shlomo Inc

To establish a center of religious instruction for the dissemination of orthodox jewish laws, traditions, and principles the study of the talmud.

Religion
11
Reb Shimon Lakol Inc

To promote religious observance and study in accordance with the jewish faith, to organize study groups in the teaching of jewish law, talmud and kaballah, as well as to provide meals and nourishment to the underprivileged and people…

International
12
Keren Hayeshivot Trust

Keren hayeshivot trust supports religious institutions of higher education in the united states and israel to raise the level of torah and halachic observance in the sephardic orthodox jewish community.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tzedukas Huir Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Rimanov Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KOLLEL SHAREI TZION LMETZYONIM: $795,000 · OtherKOLLEL SHAREI TZION LMETZYONIMKOLEL AVREICHEM OF KIRYAS JOEL: $663,000 · OtherKOLEL AVREICHEM OF KIRYAS JOELUNITED TALMUDICAL ACADEMY OF KIRYAS JOEL INC: $615,000 · OtherUNITED TALMUDICAL ACADEMY OF KIRYAS JOEL INCCONGREGATION AVNEI ZEDEK: $330,000 · OtherCONGREGATION AVNEI ZEDEKCONGREGATION YITEV LEV DERETZ YISRO: $272,000 · OtherCONGREGATION YITEV LAV DERETZ YISROEL: $229,000 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH ARYEH: $200,000 · Other+43 more: $2,531,547 · Other+43 moreTHE EVERFUND INC: $530,500 · Membership BenefitTHE EVERF…TZEDUKAS HUIR INC: $120,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF RIMANOV INC: $26,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $15,000 · Human ServicesKOLEL SHMIEL BYNUMEN INC: $115,000 · PhilanthropyROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $35,000 · PhilanthropyUTA OF KJ MC INC: $65,000 · ReligionYAAZORU INC: $25,000 · ReligionTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $6,500 · ReligionREFUAH HELPLINE INCDBA REFUAH RESOURCES: $55,000 · Health
Other$5,635,547Membership Benefit$530,500Human Services$161,000Philanthropy$150,000Religion$96,500Health$55,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE EVERFUND INC: $530,500 over 5y, 62% of budgetTZEDUKAS HUIR INC: $120,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetKOLEL SHMIEL BYNUMEN INC: $115,000 over 2y, 8.7% of budgetUTA OF KJ MC INC: $65,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetREFUAH HELPLINE INCDBA REFUAH RESOURCES: $55,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF RIMANOV INC: $26,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetYAAZORU INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE EVERFUND INC ↗
  • Who funds TZEDUKAS HUIR INC ↗
  • Who funds KOLEL SHMIEL BYNUMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds UTA OF KJ MC INC ↗
  • Who funds REFUAH HELPLINE INCDBA REFUAH RESOURCES ↗
  • Who funds ROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF RIMANOV INC ↗
  • Who funds YAAZORU INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY60.2× affinity41 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · Yaazoru Inc · Zelig and Rifky Weiss Family Foundation Inc · Vyazreim Inc · The Lexicon Foundation Inc · Chayim V Chesed · The Schwartz Charitable Foundation Inc · Strulovich Family Foundation Trust · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Hf Foundation · Yiddish Nachas Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Health Aide Services Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Health Aide Services Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Community Health Aide Services Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Community Health Aide Services Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Community Health Aide Services’ filings →

    More from the funding graph