· Public charity
Community Growth Educational Foundation
To establish committees or associations to develop and promote educational activities in connection with community growth and its associated problems.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GREATER AUSTIN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE | $4,000 |
| CHARLESTON METRO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC | $4,000 |
| SPRINGFIELD AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE | $4,000 |
| GREATER EL PASO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE | $4,000 |
| JACKSONVILLE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE | $4,000 |
| PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE OF NEW YORK STATE INC | $4,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–18) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 67% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2018, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- JCJacksonville Chamber of Commerce2× · 2017–2018 · $40k · revenue +28%
- EPEL PASO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE2× · 2017–2018 · $40k · revenue +45%
- PPPUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE OF NEW YORK STATE INC2× · 2017–2018 · $40k · revenue ×30 · 26% of their budget
Funded once
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Community Growth Educational Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Growth Educational Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Community Growth Educational’s filings →