Skip to content

· Community foundation

Community Foundation of West Alabama

To further charitable, educational, literary, religious, scientific and other endeavors within the west alabama area and to enable individuals and organizations to provide for the betterment of the community in which they reside.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
—
States reached
$135k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$1.6MEducation$872kPhilanthropy$668kFood & Nutrition$494kHuman Services$401kHealth$373kArts & Culture$228kAnimals$194kOther$0
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 38 grants below total $839,858, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,153,342 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $313,484 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $82k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $435k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $323k
$10,000
Median grant
—
States reached
$34M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA$135,335
THE CHURCH AT TUSCALOOSA$87,396
CHILDREN'S HANDS-ON MUSEUM$50,338
FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN$50,000
Individual grant recipient$48,740
ST MARK METHODIST CHURCH$46,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF TUSCALOOSA$39,242
AMERICAN CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$30,422
UNITED WAY OF WEST ALABAMA$29,200
GRACE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$28,000
UMD NEWMAN CATHOLIC CAMPUS MINISTRY$24,500
SHELTON STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$20,150
ARTS 'N AUTISM$20,000
DCH FOUNDATION$19,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.4M · 58 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

58 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

58
63

Total granted

$5.4M
$1.1M

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $57k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA
    8× · 2018–2025 · $592k
  • TP
    TRINITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    5× · 2020–2024 · $328k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    8× · 2018–2025 · $318k

Funded once

  • SW
    SECOND WIND PROGRAM INC
    one grant, 2024 · $153k
  • LI
    LOVE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $105k
  • BC
    B CHARITABLE
    one grant, 2023 · $71k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field
03the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2018–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2018 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 127 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $592,210 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMATRINITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $327,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $317,605 · OtherST MARK METHODIST CHURCH: $298,100 · OtherTHE CHURCH AT TUSCALOOSA: $265,192 · OtherUNITED WAY OF WEST ALABAMA: $252,200 · Other+121 more: $4,556,462 · Other+121 more
Other$6,609,469

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 127 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Community Foundation of West Alabama’s filings →

More from the funding graph