· Community foundation
Community Foundation of the Brazos Valley
Dedicated to improving the quality of life in the brazos valley through the development of philanthropic giving, responsible grantmaking, professional stewardship and collaborative leadership.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 62 grants below total $822,621 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,101,733 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $279,112 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k38 grants · $259k
- $10k–50k21 grants · $396k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $167k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AGGIELAND PREGNANCY OUTREACH INC | $58,013 |
| CSISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $56,409 |
| HOPE GATHERING INC | $53,041 |
| BROTHERS IN WHITE CHAPEL | $32,061 |
| Individual grant recipient | $31,938 |
| BRENHAM CHRISTIAN ACADEMY DBA CITADEL CHRISTIAN SCHOOL | $28,001 |
| UNBOUND NOW | $27,783 |
| BAYLOR UNIVERSITY | $25,000 |
| AGGIELAND HUMANE SOCIETY | $24,758 |
| ONRAMP INC | $19,952 |
| SCOTTY'S HOUSE BRAZOS VALLEY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC | $18,422 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BRAZOS VALLEY | $17,497 |
| BRAZOS VALLEY GIVES FOREVER FUND | $17,453 |
| BRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK | $15,437 |
| METHODIST RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES | $15,141 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
58 repeat relationships — 44 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $189k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CECSISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION3× · 2022–2024 · $138k
- HGHOPE GATHERING INC4× · 2020–2024 · $125k
- APAGGIELAND PREGNANCY OUTREACH INC4× · 2020–2024 · $124k
Funded once
- COCITY OF COLLEGE STATION TEXASone grant, 2020 · $500k
- TRTHE REACH PROJECTone grant, 2020 · $15k
- DDDIFFERENT DAY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 112 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.