How much did COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP grant in FY2024?

COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP reported 5 grants totaling $1,993,157 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP based?

COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP is based in ND.

COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP

Capnd serves the collective interests of its members and the low-income population of the state through representation and education.

$2.0M

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$673k

Largest

01What you fund

0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Human Services$8.3MHousing & Shelter$100kCommunity Improvement$96kEducation$70kOther$77k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

technical performancenon-competing continuationcontinuation officeoffice blockblock trainingtraining technicalperformance innovation

2019

—

2020

technical assisstanceassisstance performanceconsortiumnon-competing continuationcontinuation officeoffice blockblock training

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

2024

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$376,611

Median grant

States reached

$5.4M

Total assets

Largest grants

SENDCAA - FARGO & JAMESTOWN CAP$672,953
COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP$411,477
RED RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION - GRAND FORKS$376,611
COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP-MINOT REGION$281,333
COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP - BISMARCK$250,783

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $8.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 9%. 99% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$8.6M · 12 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$8.6M

$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%

+18%

Still filing today

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SN
SOUTHEASTERN NORTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY
7× · 2018–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +37%
CA
COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP
7× · 2018–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +5%
RR
RED RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION - GRAND FORKS
7× · 2018–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +8%

Funded once

NC
NATIONAL COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION
one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +18%
OA
OHIO ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES
one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -66%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Community Action Partnership

Assist elderly and low-income persons.

—

Community Action Commission of

Community assistance

Human Services

Community Action Partnership of Central

Agency provides community assistance to low income families and individuals.

Human Services

Community Action Partnership of

We partner with our community in fearless pursuit of anti-poverty solutions so we all have the opportunity to live well.

Unclassified

Community Action Commission of

Administers grants and programs to improve the lives of those who fall below the poverty level.

—

Community Action of Nebraska Inc

To alleviate poverty and build the capacity of nebraska's community action agencies.

Community Improvement

Minnesota Community Action Partnership

To strengthen the capacity of its member agencies to achieve their poverty-fighting missions.

—

Community Action Agency of

To assist economically disadvantaged residents of delaware county, pa in achieving self-sufficiency by providing a wide range of services including economic development, housing, emergency services, food distribution, employment and…

Housing & Shelter

Community Action Agency

Provide social services to low income families to provide them with a better quality of life.

Human Services

Community Action Agency of Oklahoma City

"important community partner" - promoting self-sufficiency and eliminating poverty in oklahoma and canadian counties.

Human Services

Community Action Partnership of

Providing low income individuals home energy assistance and providing emergency assisstance as needed

—

Community Action Agency

Provide services to economically disadvantaged individuals.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Action Region Vi and the most unlike its peers is Red River Valley Community Action. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

14/14

Grantees still filing

13/14

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Human Services$8,255,866Housing & Shelter$100,286Community Improvement$95,594Other$76,742Education$69,611

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Great Plains Food BankND13.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Great Plains Food Bank · Otto Bremer Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MONTANA HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL DIRECTOSR.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +99% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 810367454 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MONTANA HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL DIRECTOSR, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 96% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Community Action Partnership?

Find your warmest path to Community Action Partnership through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Community Action Partnership?

More from the funding graph

COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Community Action Partnership?

More from the funding graph