Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

California · Public charity

Committee to Restore Police Minimum Staffing and Public Safety

To support Police Officer Staffing Levels ballot measure in San Francisco, CA.

$278k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
4
Grants FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$100,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$103,000
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$2k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2024 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Improve Emergency Responses Times - Yes on I Sponsored by SEIU 1021 Issues PAC$103,000144%
Fix Our City SF$100,0001n/a
Healthy Vibrant SF$50,00015%
Support our First Responders Now Yes on N$25,00017%

Compare Committee to Restore Police Minimum Staffing and Public Safety with peer funders

About Committee to Restore Police Minimum Staffing and Public Safety

How much does Committee to Restore Police Minimum Staffing and Public Safety give?
Committee to Restore Police Minimum Staffing and Public Safety reported 4 grants totaling $278,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does Committee to Restore Police Minimum Staffing and Public Safety fund?
By grant dollars over FY2024 to FY2024, its largest causes are Public Safety & Disaster (46%), Public Benefit (36%), Community Improvement (18%).
Who are Committee to Restore Police Minimum Staffing and Public Safety's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2024 to FY2024: Improve Emergency Responses Times - Yes on I Sponsored by SEIU 1021 Issues PAC ($103k), Fix Our City SF ($100k), Healthy Vibrant SF ($50k).
Where is Committee to Restore Police Minimum Staffing and Public Safety based?
Committee to Restore Police Minimum Staffing and Public Safety is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 4 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Committee to Restore Police Minimum Staffing and Public Safety’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home