Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Colleen's Dream Foundation

Organization is dedicated to funding investigational scientific research with the primary goal of developing an accurate early detection test for ovarian cancer, no test currently exists.

$188k
Granted FY2017
9
Grants FY2017
8
States reached
$30k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Colleen's Dream Foundation’s FY2020 grant dollars went to Yale University, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2020 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2017, the last year Colleen's Dream Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $188k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
17
2
19
0
20

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172020.

Health$491k
02FY2017 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$20,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$218k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TGEN FOUNDATION$30,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL$28,000
MAYO CLINIC$25,000
INDIANA UNIVERSITY$20,000
JOHN HOPKINS INSTITUTIONS$20,000
UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA-CANCER CENTER$15,000
YALE UNIVERSITY$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 40% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%TGen Foundation: $225k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA-CANCER CENTER: $15k → 15%Mass General Hospital: $50k → 16%MAYO CLINIC: $25k → 14%INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $20k → 18%UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS: $20k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $20k → 14%JOHN HOPKINS INSTITUTIONS: $20k → 19%TGEN FOUNDATION: $30k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MA
IN
OH
CT
NE
MD
AZ
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
7/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION — $255,000 · HealthTHE TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATIONMAYO CLINIC — $25,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICUNIV HOSP END LC HANNA JR — $20,000 · HealthUNIV HOSP END LC HANNA JRMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $50,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCOR…BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA — $28,000 · OtherBOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UN…Indiana University School of Medicine — $20,000 · OtherIndiana University School …UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA — $15,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA+1 more — $2,834 · OtherYale University — $35,000 · EducationYale UniversityUniversity of Chicago — $20,000 · EducationUniversity of Chi…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $20,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNI…
Health$300,000Other$115,834Education$75,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION — $255,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetYale University — $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Colleen's Dream Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
  • Yale University12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Colleen's Dream Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Colleen's Dream Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2021) is on record and reports $5k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2017, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph