Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Col L C Christensen Charitable and Religious Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$158k
Granted FY2024still arriving
34
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 83% of COL L C CHRISTENSEN CHARITABLE AND RELIGIOUS FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k32 grants · $78k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$70,000
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF ABBOTSFORD$10,000
SALVATION ARMY$6,000
KLOSSNER-DIETZLER VFW POST #5729$5,000
ST CATHERINE'S HIGH SCHOOL$4,000
CHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCH$4,000
HOLY COMMUNION LUTHERAN CHURCH$3,000
ST PAUL'S LUTHERAN CHURCH$3,000
RACINE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$3,000
RACINE LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL$3,000
RACINE LITERACY COUNCIL$3,000
ST MARY'S CATHOLIC SCHOOL$3,000
ST BERNARD'S CATHOLIC CHURCH$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
ZION LUTHERAN CHURCH$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%INTERFAITH VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS OF CLARK COUNTY INC: $1k → 13%INTERFAITH VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS OF CLARK COUNTY INC: $1k → 13%INTERFAITH VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS OF CLARK COUNTY INC: $1k → 13%INTERFAITH VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS OF CLARK COUNTY INC: $1k → 13%INTERFAITH VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS OF CLARK COUNTY INC: $1k → 13%INTERFAITH VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS OF CLARK COUNTY INC: $1k → 13%INTERFAITH VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS OF CLARK COUNTY INC: $1k → 13%INTERFAITH VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS OF CLARK COUNTY INC: $1k → 13%OUR HARMONY CLUB: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 42 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +53% for the ones you funded once.

42 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
14

Total granted

$1.2M
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+53%

Still filing today

24%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF RACINE AND KENOSHA COUNTIES
    7× · 2018–2024 · $57k · revenue +187%
  • Racine Literacy Council Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $24k · revenue +77%
  • RS
    RACINE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $16k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • DC
    DeKoven Center Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +265%
  • HC
    HOLY COMMUNION LUTHERAN CHURCH - CAPITAL FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • SP
    ST PATRICK'S CATHOLIC CHURCH- JOHN XXIII EDUCATION CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Racine County Opportunity Center

Our focus is on making shortterm investments which will significantly improve the longterm wellbeing of our clients. we will measure our performance against these standards by continuously communicating with our clients, and will take…

Human Services
2
Racine Community Foundation Inc

The mission of the racine community foundation is to provide funding to racine county's hard working nonprofit organizations by stewarding our endowment to sustain this support for generations.

Philanthropy
3
Racine Zoological Society Inc

The mission of the racine zoological society is to foster an enlightening and affordable wildlife experience that improves the bond between people and nature. the society will provide for the recreation and education of the people, the…

Animals
4
Rock River Repertory Theatre

Inspire artists, audiences, and our greater southern wisconsin community to celabrate the art of theatre.

Arts & Culture
5
Catholic Cemetery Association of Racine Inc

The management and general maintenance of a cemetery or cemeteries in or near the city of racine, wisconsin, for the use and benefit of such members of the roman catholic congregations of said city and county of racine as may acquire…

6
Rocketship Education Wisconsin Inc

Founded in 2006, rocketship education is a 501 (c)(3) non-profit corporation whose mission is to eliminate the achievement gap in underserved communities across the country. the core of rocketship's instructional model is a teacher-led,…

Education
7
Racine Charter One Inc

Racine charter one, inc. is a non-profit chartered public school for inner city children in the city of racine. the mission is 21st century prepares diverse children for access to full array of life choices, including college and careers…

Education
8
St Monica's Senior Living Inc

In the spirit of our founders, the sisters of st. rita, we provide a compassionate, safe, loving family home environment that respects the dignity of all residents. we strive to meet the physical, emotional, social and spiritual needs of…

9
Racine Montessori Society Inc

Education - preschool through 8th grade

Education
10
Rock Lake Activity Center Inc

Positively affect the health and wellness of the community of lake mills, wisconsin through quality programming and activities

11
The Uwm Real Estate Foundation Inc

To partner with the public and private sectors to develop and hold real estate for the benefit of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee. the uwm real estate foundation, inc. holdings may include any properties that advance the mission of…

Housing & Shelter
12
Racine Firefighters Association

The Racine Firefighters Association is a part of the Racine Volunteer Fire Department.

Public Benefit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Racine Symphony Orchestra Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Root-Pike Watershed Initiative Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFraternal Veterans Service …Community Arts OrganizationsCommunity Development Organ…Youth Sports ProgramsFaith-Based Community Minis…Faith-Based Healthcare Syst…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number16%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr19%13%20–35yr16%39%35–55yr17%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value16%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr19%7%20–35yr16%38%35–55yr17%46%55yr+

The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
8%
1,020/12,778

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/22
Grantees still filing
16/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SCHOOL DISTRICT OF ABBOTSFORD — $137,875 · OtherSCHOOL DISTRICT OF ABBOTSFORDIndividual grant recipient — $130,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST MONICA'S SENIOR CITIZENS HOME — $99,000 · OtherST MONICA'S SENIOR CITIZENS HOMECHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCH — $66,000 · OtherCHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCHSALVATION ARMY — $47,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $44,000 · OtherHOLY COMMUNION LUTHERAN CHURCH — $39,000 · Other+43 more — $477,980 · Other+43 moreLUTHER COLLEGE — $59,000 · EducationTHE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARTER SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $2,500 · Education+1 more — $2,000 · EducationHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF RACINE AND KENOSHA COUNTIES — $57,000 · Housing & ShelterDeKoven Center Inc — $20,000 · ReligionABBOTSFORD FIRE& AMBULANCE SERV INC — $19,400 · Public Safety & DisasterRIVER BEND NATURE CENTER INC — $12,000 · EnvironmentROOT-PIKE WATERSHED INITIATIVE NETWORK INC — $5,000 · EnvironmentMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $12,500 · Philanthropy
Other$1,041,355Education$63,500Housing & Shelter$57,000Religion$20,000Public Safety & Disaster$19,400Environment$17,000Philanthropy$12,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLUTHER COLLEGE — $59,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF RACINE AND KENOSHA COUNTIES — $57,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetRacine Literacy Council Inc — $24,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetRACINE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION INC — $16,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $12,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetRIVER BEND NATURE CENTER INC — $12,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetInterfaith Volunteer Caregivers of Clark County 219V 200609 03 15 — $8,000 over 8y, 13% of budgetRACINE THEATRE GUILD INC — $5,100 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetKLOSSNER DIETZLER POST 5729 VFW — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetROOT-PIKE WATERSHED INITIATIVE NETWORK INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCHORAL ARTS SOCIETY INC — $4,400 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetFOREST SPRINGS CAMP AND CONFERENCE CENTER INC — $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMARSHFIELD CLINIC INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF MARSHFIELD INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWebster University — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP HOPE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetOUR HARMONY CLUB INC — $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetRACINE CONCERT BAND INC — $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFaith Hope & Love Inc — $200 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LUTHER COLLEGE
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF RACINE AND KENOSHA COUNTIES
  • Who funds Racine Literacy Council Inc
  • Who funds DeKoven Center Inc
  • Who funds ABBOTSFORD FIRE& AMBULANCE SERV INC
  • Who funds RACINE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds RIVER BEND NATURE CENTER INC
  • Who funds Interfaith Volunteer Caregivers of Clark County 219V 200609 03 15

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Racine Community Foundation IncWI28.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Racine Community Foundation Inc · Lang Family Foundation Inc · Sc Johnson Giving Inc · United Way of Racine County Inc · Osborne & Scekic Family Foundation Inc · Ec Styberg Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Col L C Christensen Charitable and Religious Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Col L C Christensen Charitable and Religious Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Col L C Christensen Charitable and Religious Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph