Skip to content

Pennsylvania · Private foundation

Coherent Ii-Vi Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
51
Grants FY2024
55
Organizations funded FY2023
47%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$95,000
Organizations funded a year
45 to 61
FY2020 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
13
Total assets, FY2024
$8.8M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 47% of the organizations Coherent Ii-Vi Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 45% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $780k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving50$1.4M38%
FY202355$1.7M47%
FY202261$2.0M48%
FY202151$1.7M53%
FY202045$1.3Mn/a
99% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$7.2MScience & Tech$389kHealth$190kRecreation & Sports$95kHousing & Shelter$10kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
MI
NY
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
VA
DE
AZ
KS
MS
GA
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
University of Delaware$285,00030%
University of Chicago$284,68630%
University of Pittsburgh$247,57640%
Carnegie Mellon University$236,74930%
University of Michigan$190,000228%
University of California Santa Barbara$190,0002n/a
Mississippi State University$162,0402n/a
University of Utah$142,5002n/a
University of Rochester$140,41220%
Georgia Institute of Technology$118,6752n/a
Show all 16 grantees
All grantees of Coherent Ii-Vi Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
University of Delaware$285,00030%
University of Chicago$284,68630%
University of Pittsburgh$247,57640%
Carnegie Mellon University$236,74930%
University of Michigan$190,000228%
University of California Santa Barbara$190,0002n/a
Mississippi State University$162,0402n/a
University of Utah$142,5002n/a
University of Rochester$140,41220%
Georgia Institute of Technology$118,6752n/a
Georgia Tech Research Corporation$80,70410%
Juniata College$41,31510%
Eckerd College$31,50010%
Westminster College$27,00010%
Allegheny Intermediate Unit$13,5001n/a
Alexandria Senior Housing Inc$10,00014%

Plus 130 recipients with no EIN on record ($5.9M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Coherent Ii-Vi Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 11 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Delaware: $285,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $284,686 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Pittsburgh: $247,576 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University: $236,749 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $190,000 over 2y, 28% of budgetUniversity of Rochester: $140,412 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGeorgia Tech Research Corporation: $80,704 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJuniata College: $41,315 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEckerd College: $31,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWestminster College: $27,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlexandria Senior Housing Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 11.

Compare Coherent Ii-Vi Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Coherent Ii-Vi Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Coherent Ii-Vi Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Coherent Ii-Vi Foundation

How much does Coherent Ii-Vi Foundation give?
Coherent Ii-Vi Foundation reported 51 grants totaling $1,381,018 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 45 and 61 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2023.
What does Coherent Ii-Vi Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2024, its largest causes are Education (89%), Science & Tech (5%), Health (2%).
Who are Coherent Ii-Vi Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2024: University of Delaware ($285k), University of Chicago ($285k), University of Pittsburgh ($248k).
Does Coherent Ii-Vi Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 47% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Coherent Ii-Vi Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Where is Coherent Ii-Vi Foundation based?
Coherent Ii-Vi Foundation is based in PA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 146 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Coherent Ii-Vi’s filings →

More from the funding graph