Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Co Tua Bonnie & Mike Gaffney

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$230k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Health$484kFood & Nutrition$135kPhilanthropy$95kYouth Development$60kHuman Services$58kAnimals$55kEducation$40kHousing & Shelter$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $180k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$50,000
HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK$30,000
NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS$30,000
UM BASCOM PALMER EYE INSTITUDE$20,000
MOORINGS PARK FOUNDATION$20,000
COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$20,000
NCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM$20,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN$10,000
ST MATTHEW'S HOUSE$10,000
HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $105k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $10k → 10%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $10k → 10%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $10k → 10%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $10k → 10%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $5k → 10%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $5k → 10%MOORINGS PARK FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%MOORINGS PARK FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%MOORINGS PARK FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%MOORINGS PARK FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%MOORINGS PARK FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$907k · 14 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +65% since the first grant, against -9% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
5

Total granted

$907k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
-9%

Still filing today

57%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEnvironmentAnimalsHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $304k · revenue +125%
  • HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $135k · revenue +53%
  • NN
    NAMI National
    3× · 2023–2025 · $60k · revenue +160%

Funded once

  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -9%
  • PV
    PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -10%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
3
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

4
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
5
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
6
2020 Mom Policy Center for Maternal

The policy center is improving maternal mental health outcomes through closing gaps in care delivery, including improving detection and access to evidence-based and informed clinical and community-based care. the policy center has been…

Health
7
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
8
Wellstar Mcg Health Inc

Vision: deliver world-class healthcare to every person, every time. mission: to enhance the health and well-being of every person we serve. values: we serve with compassion. we pursue excellence. we honor every voice.

9
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
10
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
11
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
12
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is World Wildlife Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $303,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCNCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC — $70,000 · HealthNCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INCNAMI National — $60,000 · HealthNAMI National+2 more — $10,000 · HealthMCDONOUGH SCHOOL OF BUSINESS — $40,000 · OtherMCDONOUGH SCHOOL OF BUSI…COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 · OtherCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDA…SHELDON BOYS & GIRLS CLUB — $35,000 · OtherSHELDON BOYS & GIRLS CLU…AMIKIDS BEAUFORT INC — $25,000 · OtherAMIKIDS BEAUFORT INCIndividual grant recipient — $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…UM BASCOM PALMER EYE INSTITUDE — $20,000 · OtherUM BASCOM PALMER EYE INS…NAT'L ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS CTL VA — $20,000 · OtherNAT'L ALLIANCE ON MENTAL…SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN — $8,000 · Other+2 more — $7,000 · OtherHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $135,000 · Food & NutritionHARRY CHAPIN FO…MOORINGS PARK FOUNDATION INC — $55,000 · Human ServicesMOORINGS PAR…THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesTHE SHELTER …PATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC — $55,000 · AnimalsST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC — $30,000 · Housing & ShelterWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $5,000 · Environment
Health$443,500Other$215,000Food & Nutrition$135,000Human Services$105,000Animals$55,000Housing & Shelter$30,000Environment$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $303,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $135,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC — $70,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetNAMI National — $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC — $55,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetMOORINGS PARK FOUNDATION INC — $55,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC — $50,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC
  • Who funds NCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC
  • Who funds NAMI National
  • Who funds PATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC
  • Who funds MOORINGS PARK FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Co Tua Bonnie & Mike Gaffney funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Co Tua Bonnie & Mike Gaffney?

Find your warmest path to Co Tua Bonnie & Mike Gaffney through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph