Skip to content

· Private foundation

Clovis Community College Foundation

To encourage, solicit, receive, and administer gifts and bequests of property and funds for scientific, educational and charitable purpose, for the advancement of clovis community college.

$54k
Granted FY2025still arriving
70
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Education$130kPublic Benefit$10kPhilanthropy$7kHealth$7kArts & Culture$4kHuman Services$3kEnvironment$3kEmployment$450Other$0
02FY2025 · 70 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k69 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
$500
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLOVIS COMMUNITY COLLEGE$15,790
Individual grant recipient$1,999
BRITTANY DE LA TORRE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%JORDON TRIANA: $1k → 12%KENDA MARTINEZ: $1k → 14%JULIA MURRAY: $1k → 14%MIKYLA HUTWOHL: $1k → 14%CARLA OSBORN: $1k → 18%SUMMER KRUCKMAN: $1k → 19%CASSY LOEDOLFF: $2k → 24%CLOVIS COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $16k → 18%MARISOL DOMINGUEZ-GARCIA: $1k → 18%CLOVIS COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $5k → 18%LYNSEY SANCHEZ: $1k → 18%VANESSA GONZALES: $2k → 18%DESIREE SANCHEZ: $1k → 18%TRINITY BENFIEL: $2k → 18%LYNSEY SANCHEZ: $1k → 18%KEVIN VAQUERA: $1k → 14%BIANCA BELTRAN: $1k → 18%MCKAYLA NIXON: $1k → 18%DANIELLE HAWKINS: $1k → 18%EDANA TORRES: $1k → 18%ASHLEE LEE: $1k → 18%MAIRA ALANIZ: $1k → 18%TEYA MORRIS: $1k → 18%AUBRIE SANCHEZ: $1k → 18%BRITTANY DE LA TORRE: $1k → 18%MARISOL DOMINGUEZ: $1k → 18%ANNA BALCITA: $1k → 18%EDANA TORRES: $1k → 18%BRITTNY COLE: $1k → 18%DENIELLE CARPENTER: $1k → 18%SARAH BUTTERBAUGH: $1k → 18%DAVID BYRD: $1k → 18%KARINA POMPA: $1k → 18%MELISSA RUBIO: $1k → 18%MEGHAN HOWARD: $1k → 18%NOAH HERNANDEZ: $1k → 18%PIO AQUINO: $1k → 18%ZERLINA VELEZ: $1k → 18%CHERYL FOX: $1k → 18%ALANA FACKLER: $1k → 18%ALEXIA WATERS: $1k → 18%NANCY BROOKS: $1k → 18%CHEYENNE BRADDOCK: $1k → 18%ALEXIA WATERS: $1k → 18%CARLA LOPEZ: $1k → 18%JESSICA MAYO: $1k → 18%BRITTANY DE LA TORRE: $1k → 18%KARINA POMPA: $1k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

34%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$57k · 29 repeat orgs$108k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 56 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
182

Total granted

$57k
$79k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CLOVIS COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $21k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2024–2025 · $3k
  • BD
    BRITTANY DE LA TORRE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2023–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2023 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 267 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLOVIS COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $20,650 · OtherCLOVIS COMMUNITY COLLEGE+199 more: $135,151 · Other+199 more
Other$155,801

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 267 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Clovis Community College’s filings →

More from the funding graph