Skip to content
Plinth

· Community foundation

Clearfield County Charitable Foundation

Assists donors to enhance charitable giving by building and maintaining a permanent collection of endowment funds exclusively for the betterment of clearfield county for present and future generations

$533k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$54k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Human Services$542kEducation$408kArts & Culture$159kCommunity Improvement$26kAnimals$8kHousing & Shelter$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $305,667 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $532,694 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $227,027 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $191k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $107k
$43,154
Median grant
1
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOSEPH AND ELIZABETH SHAW PUBLIC LIBRARY$53,760
CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY$53,222
CLEARFIELD YMC$44,711
CLEARFIELD CO HISTORICAL SOCIETY$43,420
SALVATION ARMY$43,154
CLEARFIELD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$29,300
Individual grant recipient$15,000
DOWNTOWN DUBOIS$15,000
SERENDIPITY HORSE RESCUE RANCH$8,100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $173k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MOSHANNON VALLEY YMCA: $6k → 16%CLEARFIELD YMC: $45k → 12%CLEARFIELD YMC: $36k → 12%CLEARFIELD YMC: $28k → 12%CLEARFIELD YMC: $21k → 12%CLEARFIELD YMC: $17k → 12%CLEARFIELD YMC: $12k → 12%CLEARFIELD YMC: $9k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 6 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
3

Total granted

$1.1M
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+11%

Still filing today

83%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JE
    JOSEPH & ELIZABETH SHAW PUBLIC LIBRARY
    7× · 2018–2024 · $215k · revenue +148%
  • CA
    Childrens Aid Society in Clearfield County
    7× · 2018–2024 · $210k · revenue +35%
  • CE
    CLEARFIELD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $192k · revenue +25% · 100% of their budget

Funded once

  • CR
    Clearfield Revitalization Corporationgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $11k · revenue +44%
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRE COUNTY
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue -24%
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION IN CLFD CTY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +11%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Clearfield Volunteer Fire Department

The protection, preservation of life and property during emergencies as may occur in the Borough of Clearfield and surrounding communities.

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Habitat for Humanity of ClearfieldCounty

Habitat for Humanity is an ecumenical, grassroots Christian ministry with the goal of eliminating poverty housing.

3
Clearfield County Area Agency On Aging Inc

Program Services to Aging Population in Clearfield County

Human Services
4
Clairton Public Library

Operation of a public library which provides books, videos, periodicals and other eductional materials for area residents to use an borrow.

Education
5
Claysville Area Preservation and Revitalization Initiative

We strive to revitalize the Claysville area and preserve its heritage.

Community Improvement
6
Central Pennsylvania Community Action

To plan, promote and implement community action programs for the Clearfield and Centre County areas.

Human Services
7
Clearfield County Public Library

To provide quality library resources that inform, educate, entertain, and enrich all the residents of clearfield county, pennsylvania.

8
Crawford County Federated Library System

Organization formed to support member libraries in crawford county, pa

Education
9
Uniontown Community Development Association Ucda

The Association undertakes projects that reduce community deteriora- tion through the renovation of vacant and deteriorating buildings.

Community Improvement
10
Mature Resources Foundation

Medical Clinic Services & Housing for those in Need

Philanthropy
11
Clear Lake Development Foundation

To further the development of Clear Lake, IA and the surrounding area for its citizens.

12
Saints Peter & Paul Clear Creek Her

Preservation of historical building which is part of the rich heritage of catholic roots in this part of keokuk county, iowa

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Clearfield Revitalization Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Joseph & Elizabeth Shaw Public Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JOSEPH & ELIZABETH SHAW PUBLIC LIBRARY — $215,151 · OtherJOSEPH & ELIZABETH SHAW PUBLIC LIBRARYChildrens Aid Society in Clearfield County — $210,014 · OtherChildrens Aid Society in Clearfield CountyCLEARFIELD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $192,369 · OtherCLEARFIELD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INCClearfield County Historical Society — $159,423 · OtherClearfield County Historical SocietyTHE SALVATION ARMY — $158,620 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY+4 more — $43,350 · OtherYoung Mens' Christian Association of Clearfield — $167,481 · Human ServicesYoung Mens' Chri…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRE COUNTY — $6,000 · Human ServicesClearfield Revitalization Corporation — $10,660 · Community Improvement
Other$978,927Human Services$173,481Community Improvement$10,660

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJOSEPH & ELIZABETH SHAW PUBLIC LIBRARY — $215,151 over 7y, 18% of budgetChildrens Aid Society in Clearfield County — $210,014 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetCLEARFIELD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $192,369 over 7y, 100% of budgetYoung Mens' Christian Association of Clearfield — $167,481 over 7y, 4.8% of budgetClearfield County Historical Society — $159,423 over 7y, 21% of budgetDOWNTOWN DUBOIS INC — $15,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetClearfield Revitalization Corporation — $10,660 over 1y, 15% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRE COUNTY — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION IN CLFD CTY INC — $5,250 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Clearfield County Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Clearfield County Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Clearfield County Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph