Skip to content

· Public charity

Clean Air Now Coalition

To lobby, organize, and promote legislative action and civic engagement to combat the impacts of climate change.

$54M
Granted FY2022
15
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$48M
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2022 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $665k
  • $250k+5 grants · $53M
$100,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Clean Air California$47,700,000
California Democratic Party$4,850,000
California Environmental Voters$350,000
California Environmental Voters Independent Expenditures Committee$250,000
Tides Advocacy$250,000
California Environmental Voters Issues Committee$200,000
Yes on Proposition 1$150,000
House Majority Forward$100,000
Coalition for Clean Air$90,000
SPUR$75,000
California Chamber of Commerce$50,000
Community Partners$30,000
Silicon Valley Leadership Group$25,000
Forth Mobility Fund$15,000
Advanced Energy Economy Inc$6,500
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 10% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Silicon Valley Leadership Group: $25k → 8%Clean Air California: $47.7M → 8%California Environmental Voters Issues Committee: $200k → 10%Tides Advocacy: $250k → 10%California Chamber of Commerce: $50k → 12%Community Partners: $30k → 14%House Majority Forward: $100k → 14%Forth Mobility Fund: $15k → 12%California Environmental Voters: $350k → 10%SPUR: $75k → 10%California Democratic Party: $4.8M → 12%Coalition for Clean Air: $90k → 14%Advanced Energy Economy Inc: $7k → 14%California Environmental Voters Independent Expenditures Committee: $250k → 10%Yes on Proposition 1: $150k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
2
California Policy Group

The purpose of the organization is to provide objective, nonpartisan and balanced research analysis and commentary regarding legislation important to the California economy.

Public Benefit
3
California Environmental Justice Alliance

Our mission is to fight against fossil fuel executives and industries that have turned our communities into dumping grounds for toxic waste, poisoning our air, water, lan, and bodies. We organize to oppose giant oil refineries, dirty…

Environment
4
California Council for Environmental and Economic Balance

To create a california where balancing economic growth and environmental protection is not only a vision, but also a reality.

—
5
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
6
California Energy Efficiency Industry Council

To support appropriate energy efficiency and demand management policies and programs for all Californians to create sustainable jobs, long-term economic vitality, stable and reasonably priced energy systems and environmental improvement.

Community Improvement
7
Center for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Technologies

CEERT designs and fights for policies that advance clean, renewable, energy and climate solutions for California and the West. CEERT's team of professional staff, active board members, expert consultants, and clean-technology and…

Environment
8
California Environmental Voters Education Fund

ENVIROVOTERS ED FUND is a nonpartisan organization dedicated to improving the quality of the environment for all Californians. ENVIROVOTERS ED FUND works to build the capacity of environmental organizations by developing and providing…

Environment
9
California Taxpayers Association

CalTaxs mission is to serve the general public and our members including Fortune 500 companies, small businesses and individuals by promoting sound tax policy and government efficiency at the state and local levels of government through…

—
10
California Coastkeeper dba California Coastkeeper Alliance

California Coastkeeper Alliance unites Waterkeeper programs statewide to fight for swimmable, fishable, and drinkable waters for all Californians.

Environment
11
California Electric Transportation Coalition

To promote cleaner, healthier air through the development and use of zero-emission electric vehicles, hybrid electric vehicles, electric mass transit buses, and rail.

—
12
CalMatters

Our team of experienced journalists, with the time and resources to dig deep, is committed to meaningfully informing Californians about the players, politics, and interests that shape the issues that affect their lives.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Coalition for Clean Air; the most unlike its peers is Forth Mobility Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Clean Air California: $47,700,000 · OtherClean Air CaliforniaCalifornia Democratic Party: $4,850,000 · OtherCalifornia Democratic Party+6 more: $800,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL VOTERS: $550,000 · Civil RightsHOUSE MAJORITY FORWARD: $100,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $30,000 · Community ImprovementAdvanced Energy United Inc: $6,500 · Community ImprovementCoalition for Clean Air: $90,000 · EnvironmentForth Mobility Fund: $15,000 · Environment
Other$53,350,000Civil Rights$550,000Community Improvement$136,500Environment$105,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetClean Air California: $47,700,000 over 1y, 95% of budgetCALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL VOTERS: $550,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetTIDES ADVOCACY: $250,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOUSE MAJORITY FORWARD: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCoalition for Clean Air: $90,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetSPUR - SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA PLANNING AND URBAN RESEARCH ASSOCIATION: $75,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SILICON VALLEY LEADERSHIP GROUP: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetForth Mobility Fund: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAdvanced Energy United Inc: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Energy Action FundCA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Energy Action Fund · Natural Resources Defense Council Inc · United States Energy Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Clean Air Now Coalition funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Clean Air Now Coalition. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Forth Mobility Fund: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Clean Air Now Coalition?

Find your warmest path to Clean Air Now Coalition through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record and reports $80k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Clean Air Now Coalition’s filings →

More from the funding graph