Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Clay County Educational Endowment Association Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$17k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Community Improvement$2.0MEducation$271kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$490
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$2,080
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
GARFIELD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$1,000
WAKEFIELD K-12 SCHOOL$1,000
CLAY CENTER COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL$1,000
LINCOLN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$1,000
CLAY CENTER COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
BOARD OF EDUCATION UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 379$1,000
Individual grant recipient$700
Individual grant recipient$700
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$350
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ALYXIS BOWEN: $9k → 13%KAMBER RENEE SCHULZE: $6k → 10%MCKENNA SAVENER: $2k → 12%ALYXIS BOWEN: $6k → 13%KAMBER RENEE SCHULZE: $3k → 10%EMILY WILLIAMS: $6k → 20%EMILY WILLIAMS: $3k → 20%WITT WILLIAMS: $2k → 20%GARRETT CRAIG: $5k → 12%GABRIELLE NELMS: $5k → 12%AUTUMN ADAMS: $3k → 12%HAYLIE AVERY: $2k → 12%TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO CLAY CENTER COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT FOUNDATION: $1.9M → 12%TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO CLAY CENTER COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT FOUNDATION: $14k → 12%TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO CLAY CENTER COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT FOUNDATION: $12k → 12%KEELY JERMARK: $9k → 12%BOBBI ROOKSTOOL: $9k → 12%KEELY JERMARK: $6k → 12%NIKOLE RYAN: $5k → 12%BOARD OF EDUCATION UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 379: $5k → 12%BOARD OF EDUCATION UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 379: $3k → 12%EVAN ROSENOW: $3k → 12%DYLAN MOON: $3k → 12%BOBBI ROOKSTOOL: $3k → 12%KATHERINE SLEICHTER: $3k → 12%BOBBI ROOKSTOOL: $3k → 12%KEELY JERMARK: $3k → 12%JENNA MALL: $3k → 12%KELBY WICHMAN: $3k → 12%ERIN HAMMEL: $3k → 12%ISAAC MUGLER: $3k → 12%WYATT KIPFER: $3k → 12%ERICA ALQUIST: $3k → 12%CODY MOON: $3k → 12%LUKE KOPPES: $3k → 12%LEXI LIBY: $3k → 12%JALYN KASPER: $3k → 12%KEATH MEYER: $3k → 12%MEGAN CARLSON: $2k → 12%SARABETH MARTIN: $2k → 12%MARIAH LARSON: $2k → 12%HALEY JONES: $2k → 12%RYAN TIERS: $2k → 12%SIMON LEE: $2k → 12%BOARD OF EDUCATION UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 379: $2k → 12%CALEY HARTNER: $2k → 12%JACOB BUSH: $2k → 12%CODY MOON: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.1M · 40 repeat orgs$136k to everyone else

40 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 30 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
122

Total granted

$2.1M
$127k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TO
    TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO CLAY CENTER COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT FOUNDATION
    3× · 2019–2021 · $2.0M
  • BO
    BOARD OF EDUCATION UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 379
    7× · 2017–2024 · $23k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2017–2019 · $18k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 170 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO CLAY CENTER COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT FOUNDATION — $1,969,892 · OtherTRANSFER OF FUNDS TO CLAY CENTER COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT FOUNDATION+169 more — $273,420 · Other+169 more
Other$2,243,312

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Clay County Educational Endowment Association Inc?

Find your warmest path to Clay County Educational Endowment Association Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 170 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph