Skip to content

· Private foundation

Christopher J & Melissa S Morley Private Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2017
10
Grants FY2017
3
States reached
$6k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

88% of Christopher J & Melissa S Morley Private Family Foundation Inc’s FY2018 grant dollars went to Bank Of America Charitable Gift Fd, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2018 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2017, the last year Christopher J & Melissa S Morley Private Family Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $16k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
’17
4
’18

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Philanthropy$44kEducation$17kReligion$3kAnimals$2kRecreation & Sports$885Environment$400Health$100
02FY2017 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RIPPOWAM CISQUA SCHOOL$6,000
ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY$3,500
ST MATHEWS CHURCH$3,000
PALM BEACH ZOO$1,000
MILLBROOK SCHOOL$1,000
FOXCROFT SCHOOL$1,000
BEDFORD RIDING LANES ASSOCIATION$200
NORTH SALEM OPEN LAND FOUNDATION$200
NORTH SALEM BRIDAL TRAIL ASSOCIATIO$185
UVA CRAIG SLINGLUFF HEALTH FOUNDATI$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–18) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 74% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $44k → 16%13 HANDS EQUINE RESCUE INC: $500 → 9%NORTH SALEM BRIDLE TRAILS ASSOC: $500 → 9%ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 18%PALM BEACH ZOO: $1k → 11%UVA CRAIG SLINGLUFF HEALTH FOUNDATI: $100 → 22%MILLBROOK SCHOOL: $1k → 9%NORTH SALEM OPEN LAND FOUNDATION: $200 → 9%NORTH SALEM OPEN LAND FOUNDATION: $200 → 9%NORTH SALEM BRIDAL TRAIL ASSOCIATIO: $185 → 9%RIPPOWAM CISQUA SCHOOL: $6k → 9%RIPPOWAM CISQUA SCHOOL: $5k → 9%ST MATHEWS CHURCH: $3k → 9%BEDFORD RIDING LANES ASSOCIATION: $200 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12k · 3 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2017, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2017 (too recent to call). Read against FY2017, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
8

Total granted

$12k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+154%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
EducationAnimalsEnvironmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    The Rippowam Cisqua School Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $11k · revenue +24%
  • NS
    NORTH SALEM BRIDLE TRAILS ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $685 · revenue -58%
  • NS
    NORTH SALEM OPEN LAND FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $400 · revenue +338%

Funded once

  • ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $4k · revenue +4%
  • SM
    ST MATHEWS CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • Foxcroft Schoolgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +82%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Presumpscot Regional Land Trust

We engage with communities to conserve, steward, and provide access to local lands and clean water for current and future generations to enjoy.

—
2
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
3
Land Conservancy of Ridgefield Inc

The Land Conservancy of Ridgefield, Inc. ("the Land Conservancy"), founded in 1967, preserves and protects, for the general benefit of the public, Ridgefield, Connecticut's natural resources including land and water resources, the plant…

Environment
4
Colebrook Land Conservancy Inc

Conservation of land

Environment
5
Brewster Conservation Trust

Land conservation

Environment
6
Barnstable Land Trust Inc

Preservation of undeveloped land in the town of barnstable and nearby areas

Environment
7
Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc

Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements

Food & Nutrition
8
Seekonk Land Conservation Trust

Open Space preservation and education

Environment
9
Breck School

We create confident learners who lead lives of intellectual curiosity, self-knowledge, and social responsibility.

Education
10
Friends of Knox Farm State Park Inc

To promote, support, preserve, and protect the recreational facilities, natural habitats, permanent green space and historic and cultural resources of knox farm state park through educational programs and other activities.

Recreation & Sports
11
Franklin Land Trust Inc

The franklin land trust works to conserve farms, forests, wildlands, and other natural resources significant to the quality of the environment, economy, and rural character of western massachusetts.

Environment
12
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Millbrook School; the most unlike its peers is 13 Hands Equine Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD: $43,648 · PhilanthropyBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FDThe Rippowam Cisqua School Inc: $11,000 · EducationThe Rippowam Cisqua School I…ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $3,500 · EducationST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITYFoxcroft School: $1,000 · EducationFoxcroft SchoolMILLBROOK SCHOOL: $1,000 · EducationMILLBROOK SCHOOLST MATHEWS CHURCH: $3,000 · OtherNORTH SALEM BRIDLE TRAILS ASSOCIATION: $685 · Other+1 more: $100 · OtherTHE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF THE PALM BEACHES INC: $1,000 · Animals13 HANDS EQUINE RESCUE INC: $500 · AnimalsNORTH SALEM OPEN LAND FOUNDATION INC: $400 · EnvironmentBEDFORD RIDING LANES ASSOCIATION: $200 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$43,648Education$16,500Other$3,785Animals$1,500Environment$400Recreation & Sports$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Rippowam Cisqua School Inc: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFoxcroft School: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILLBROOK SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF THE PALM BEACHES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SALEM BRIDLE TRAILS ASSOCIATION: $685 over 2y, 0.2% of budget13 HANDS EQUINE RESCUE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNORTH SALEM OPEN LAND FOUNDATION INC: $400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBEDFORD RIDING LANES ASSOCIATION: $200 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lanbro FoundationSC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lanbro Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Christopher J & Melissa S Morley Private Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Christopher J & Melissa S Morley Private Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2019) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2017, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Christopher J & Melissa S Morley Private Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph