Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

New Jersey · Public charity

Chop4change

CHOP4CHANGE is a movement led by members of the rutgers football team. Its aim is to combat racism and inequality by promoting social justice and providing resources to local communities in need.

$60k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
3
Itemized grants FY2024
3
Organizations funded FY2023
67%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$41k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$10,458
Largest grant, FY2024
$25,000
Organizations funded a year
3 to 4
FY2022 to FY2023
Total assets, FY2024
$3k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 67% of the organizations Chop4change funded were first-time grantees, receiving 46% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving3$41k33%
FY20233$27k67%
FY20224$94kn/a
80% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$65kHuman Services$43kEducation$26kFood & Nutrition$16kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest grants in FY2024.

ATHLETES IN ACTION$25,000
COATS FOR FAMILIES IN NEED$10,458
YATES HOUSE FOR MILITARY VETERANS$5,950

Compare Chop4change with peer funders

About Chop4change

How much does Chop4change give?
Chop4change reported 3 itemized grants totaling $41,408, out of $59,958 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 4 organizations a year over FY2022 to FY2023.
What does Chop4change fund?
By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2024, its largest causes are Recreation & Sports (40%), Human Services (26%), Education (16%).
Does Chop4change fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 67% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is Chop4change based?
Chop4change is based in NJ.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Chop4change’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home