Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Chipman Union Foundation

Its FY2019 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$279k
Granted FY2019
3
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$251k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172019.

Religion$322kYouth Development$10kEducation$9kHuman Services$3kInternational$2kEmployment$1k
02FY2019 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $27k
  • $250k+1 grant · $251k
$26,862
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Atlas Ministries$251,265
New Springfield Baptist Church$26,862
Ga Tech Foundation$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 24%. 0% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 24%Alexander Tharpe fund: $1k → 13%Atlas Ministries: $251k → 14%Mercer University: $1k → 23%Athens Tech Foundation: $1k → 27%Alexander Tharpe fund: $1k → 13%Atlas Ministries: $26k → 14%Mercer University: $1k → 23%Ga Tech Foundation: $1k → 13%Pate Nance Boys and Girls Club: $5k → 14%Ga Tech Foundation: $1k → 13%Pate Nance Boys and Girls Club: $5k → 14%Ga Tech Foundation: $1k → 13%Atlas Ministries: $3k → 14%Atlas Ministries: $3k → 14%Bethel Baptist Church: $1k → 14%First Presby Church: $1k → 14%Globial Samaritans: $1k → 14%Globial Samaritans: $1k → 14%Penfield Christian Home: $1k → 14%Penfield Christian Home: $1k → 14%First Baptist Church: $1k → 14%First Presby Church: $1k → 14%First Baptist Church: $1k → 14%Bethel Baptist Church: $1k → 14%New Springfield Baptist Church: $27k → 14%Mount Pleasant Baptist Church: $7k → 14%Greene County Library: $1k → 14%Greene County Library: $1k → 14%Greene County Xmas Stocking Fund: $250 → 14%Greene County Xmas Stocking Fund: $250 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$312k · 12 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2019, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
2

Total granted

$312k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+207%
+235%

Still filing today

17%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
EducationInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AM
    Atlas Ministries
    3× · 2017–2019 · $283k
  • PN
    Pate Nance Boys and Girls Club
    2× · 2017–2018 · $10k
  • GT
    Ga Tech Foundation
    3× · 2017–2019 · $3k

Funded once

  • MP
    MOUNT PLEASANT BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $7k
  • AT
    ATHENS TECH FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +235%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
3/3
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Atlas Ministries — $282,717 · OtherAtlas MinistriesNEW SPRINGFIELD BAPTIST CHURCH — $26,862 · OtherNEW SPRINGFIELD BAPTIST CHURCH+10 more — $32,214 · Other+10 moreTHE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY — $2,000 · EducationATHENS TECH FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · EducationGLOBAL SAMARITANS INC — $2,000 · International
Other$341,793Education$3,000International$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGLOBAL SAMARITANS INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetATHENS TECH FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GLOBAL SAMARITANS INC
  • Who funds THE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds ATHENS TECH FOUNDATION INC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Chipman Union Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Chipman Union Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Chipman Union Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph