Skip to content
Chinuch Guidance and Support Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Chinuch Guidance and Support Inc

To render services that guide, support and nurture at-risk and pre-at-risk youth and their parents, on all continents of the globe, with social, emotional and personal challenges facing today's Jewish religious children and adults via parent and child advising; group and private young adult counseling; ongoing mentoring; Rabbinic and…

$105k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Religion$136kHuman Services$18k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $35,800, the rows itemized in this filing. The $104,739 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $68,939 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$198k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Bnos Menachem$25,000
Tomchei Tmimim$10,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 87% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Yeshiva Mesivta Menachem: $12k → 9%BAIS LEVI YITZCHOK: $6k → 14%Tomchei Tmimim: $11k → 20%Yeshiva Mesivta Menachem: $7k → 9%Zichron Menachem: $50k → 14%Tomchei Tmimim: $7k → 20%Bnos Menachem: $25k → 20%BNOS MENACHEM INC: $10k → 20%Beis Tzvi: $25k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$73k · 3 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

$73k
$81k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BM
    BNOS MENACHEM INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $35k
  • YM
    YESHIVA MESIVTA MENACHEM
    2× · 2021–2022 · $20k
  • CY
    CONGREGATION YESHIVA TOMCHEI TMIMIM LUBAVITCH INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $18k

Funded once

  • ZM
    ZICHRON MENACHEM INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • BT
    Beis Tzvi
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • BL
    BAIS LEVI YITZCHOK INC
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2021–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2021 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ZICHRON MENACHEM INC: $50,000 · OtherZICHRON MENACHEM INCBNOS MENACHEM INC: $35,000 · OtherBNOS MENACHEM INCBeis Tzvi: $25,000 · OtherBeis TzviYESHIVA MESIVTA MENACHEM: $19,774 · OtherYESHIVA MESIVTA MENACHEMCONGREGATION YESHIVA TOMCHEI TMIMIM LUBAVITCH INC: $18,000 · OtherCONGREGATION YESHIVA TOMCHEI TMIMIM LUBAVITCH INCBAIS LEVI YITZCHOK INC: $6,000 · Other
Other$153,774

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Chinuch Guidance and Support’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home