· Public charity
China Summit Foundation Inc
To organize and support china-related summits, conferences, and other events events in the us and overseas.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2018
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| E-HOUSE CHINA | $60,000 |
| WEEDUCATION GROUP INC | $10,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
US giving: 13% of grant dollars ($20k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 87% that went abroad ($130k) is mapped below.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–17) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Beyond the US: 87% of all-years giving ($130k)
1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
How this is measured
1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2018.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2018, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Play a game based on China Summit’s filings →