Skip to content

· Public charity

Chilifest Inc

Chilifest is a two-day music festival that draws in over 35,000 people each year and features performances from some of the biggest names in country music and rock.

$157k
Granted FY2019
9
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Recreation & Sports$106kYouth Development$67kHealth$24kPublic Safety & Disaster$24kHuman Services$24kFood & Nutrition$18kPublic Benefit$6k
02FY2019 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $93,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $157,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $64,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k6 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
$8,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$64k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BURLESON COUNTY GO TEXAN$25,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$15,000
COACH BLAIR CHARITIES$10,000
ST JOSEPH EMS$8,000
SNOOK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$8,000
BURLESON COUNTY FIRST REPONDERS$8,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$7,000
VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS$6,000
SNOOK AG BOOSTERS$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%BURLESON COUNTY FIRST REPONDERS: $8k → 15%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $7k → 16%COACH BLAIR CHARITIES: $11k → 22%BURLESON COUNTY FIRST REPONDERS: $8k → 15%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $7k → 16%COACH BLAIR CHARITIES: $10k → 22%BURLESON COUNTY FIRST REPONDERS: $8k → 15%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $6k → 16%COACH BLAIR CHARITIES: $10k → 22%VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS: $6k → 15%ST JOSEPH EMS: $8k → 22%BURLESON COUNTY GO TEXAN: $25k → 15%ST JOSEPH EMS: $8k → 22%BURLESON COUNTY GO TEXAN: $25k → 15%CHI ST JOSEPH EMS: $8k → 22%BURLESON COUNTY GO TEXAN: $25k → 15%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $17k → 22%SNOOK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $8k → 15%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $15k → 22%SNOOK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $8k → 15%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $15k → 22%SNOOK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $8k → 15%SNOOK AG BOOSTERS: $6k → 15%SNOOK AG BOOSTERS: $6k → 15%SNOOK AG BOOSTERS: $6k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$263k · 8 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2019, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
1

Total granted

$263k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+112%

Still filing today

63%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Recreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyHealthPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BURLESON COUNTY GO-TEXAN ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $75k · revenue +30% · 28% of their budget
  • BC
    Boys Club of Brazos County Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $47k · revenue +51%
  • CB
    COACH BLAIR CHARITIES
    3× · 2017–2019 · $31k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • VO
    VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS DEPARTMENT-4458 CAMPBELL WILLIAMSgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue +112%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SNOOK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $24,000 · OtherSNOOK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTBURLESON COUNTY FIRST REPONDERS: $24,000 · OtherBURLESON COUNTY FIRST REPONDERSBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH TEXAS INC: $20,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH TE…SNOOK AG BOOSTERS: $18,000 · OtherSNOOK AG BOOSTERSBURLESON COUNTY GO-TEXAN ASSOCIATION: $75,000 · Recreation & SportsBURLESON COUNTY GO-TEXAN ASSOCI…Boys Club of Brazos County Inc: $47,000 · Youth DevelopmentBoys Club of Brazos…COACH BLAIR CHARITIES: $31,000 · PhilanthropyCOACH BLAIR C…ST JOSEPH REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER: $24,000 · HealthST JOSEPH …VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS DEPARTMENT-4458 CAMPBELL WILLIAMS: $6,000 · Public Benefit
Other$86,000Recreation & Sports$75,000Youth Development$47,000Philanthropy$31,000Health$24,000Public Benefit$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBURLESON COUNTY GO-TEXAN ASSOCIATION: $75,000 over 3y, 28% of budgetBoys Club of Brazos County Inc: $47,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetCOACH BLAIR CHARITIES: $31,000 over 3y, 9.5% of budgetST JOSEPH REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER: $24,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH TEXAS INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chilifest Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chilifest Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Chilifest Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Chilifest Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2021) is on record but names no grant recipient (grants abroad are filed by region only, and grants under $5,000 are not itemized), so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chilifest’s filings →

    More from the funding graph