Skip to content

· Public charity

Children's Advocacy Centers of Kansas Inc

The children's advocacy center of kansas (cacks) is committed to securing appropriate resources for ensuring the healthy establishment and sustainability of kansas child advocacy centers and the kansas chapter.

$391k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$121k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $10k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $203k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $179k
$39,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$408k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA$121,114
SUNLIGHT CHILDREN'S SERVICES$57,588
RICE COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$46,729
WESTERN KANSAS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$44,245
FRANKLIN COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$39,500
SUNFLOWER HOUSE$26,861
STEPPING STONES CACSUNFLOWER CHILDREN'S COLLECTIVE$19,625
HORIZONS CAC HORIZONS MENTAL HEALTH CENTER$13,237
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC$12,410
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF DOUGLAS COUNTY$9,994
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 67% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA: $121k → 16%SUNFLOWER HOUSE: $27k → 5%WESTERN KANSAS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $44k → 8%SUNLIGHT CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $58k → 8%RICE COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $47k → 11%CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF DOUGLAS COUNTY: $10k → 15%HORIZONS CAC HORIZONS MENTAL HEALTH CENTER: $13k → 15%FRANKLIN COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $40k → 16%CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $12k → 18%STEPPING STONES CACSUNFLOWER CHILDREN'S COLLECTIVE: $20k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Child Advocacy Center

To combat child sexual and physical abuse by providing services to children and families in a safe enviroment.

Human Services
2
Rusk County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc

To prevent, treat, and reduce the trauma of the investigative process for child abuse victims and their non-offending family members.

Crime & Legal
3
Safe Spot Child Advocacy Center of Wilkes

To help bring hope, healing, and justice to children in our community affected by sexual abuse or severe physical abuse. Safe Spot provides direct services to help child victims & nonoffending caregivers at no cost and to facilitate a…

Youth Development
4
The Childrens House

To reduce trauma to children who have experienced abuse as well as their families by providing a safe and supportive environment through a collaboration of community agencies.

—
5
Guadalupe County Children's Advocacy Center

To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…

Crime & Legal
6
Vermilion County Child Advocacy Center

Perform forensic interviews on minor children in response to calls from either the Department of Children and Family Services or law enforcement, regarding potential abuse of the child. The Center works as an advocate for the child with…

Crime & Legal
7
Carroll County Child Advocacy Center Inc

The Carroll County Child Advocacy Center exists to champion the needs of sexually, physically, and emotionally abused children in Carroll, Haralson and Heard counties through prevention, intervention and collaboration.

—
8
Walker County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc

Walker County Childrens Advocacy Center, Inc. will provide services to child victims of physical and sexual abuse, severely neglected children and children who have witnessed a violent crime. The Center will work every day to try and stop…

Human Services
9
Childrens Advocacy Center of Smith County

The children's advocacy center of smith county's mission is to protect and restore the lives of abused children through team investigations, healing services, community outreach and strategic partnerships.

Crime & Legal
10
Delta Childrens Advocacy Center

Delta Childrens Advocacy Centers mission is to respond to child abuse in the Mississippi Delta by serving and nurturing children and non-offending caregivers through a trauma-informed multidisciplinary approach.

Crime & Legal
11
Child and Youth Advocacy Center

To operate a comprehensive child youth focused program based in a facility that allows law enforcement, child protection, mental health education professionals, prosecutors, medical and support services to work together to handle child…

Human Services
12
Casa of Tipton County

Child Advocacy Services

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Advocacy Center of Douglas County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Horizons Mental Health Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
2/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center: $121,114 · OtherUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences CenterSUNLIGHT CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $57,588 · OtherSUNLIGHT CHILDREN'S SERVICES INCFRANKLIN COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $39,500 · OtherFRANKLIN COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTERChildren's Advocacy Center of Douglas County Inc: $9,994 · OtherWestern Kansas Child Advocacy Center: $44,245 · Crime & LegalWestern Kansas Child Adv…SUNFLOWER HOUSE INC: $26,861 · Crime & LegalSUNFLOWER HOUSE INCCHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF SEDGWICK COUNTY: $12,410 · Crime & LegalCHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF…RICE COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $46,729 · HealthRICE COUNTY CHILD…HORIZONS MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $13,237 · HealthHORIZONS MENTAL H…SUNFLOWER CHILDREN'S COLLECTIVE INC: $19,625 · Civil Rights
Other$228,196Crime & Legal$83,516Health$59,966Civil Rights$19,625

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRICE COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $46,729 over 1y, 26% of budgetWestern Kansas Child Advocacy Center: $44,245 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetSUNFLOWER HOUSE INC: $26,861 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSUNFLOWER CHILDREN'S COLLECTIVE INC: $19,625 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetHORIZONS MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $13,237 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF SEDGWICK COUNTY: $12,410 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Children's Advocacy Centers of Kansas’ filings →

More from the funding graph