Skip to content
Child Mind Institute Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Child Mind Institute Inc

The child mind institute is dedicated to transforming the lives of children and families struggling with mental health and learning disorders by giving them the help they need to thrive.

$8.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$3.8M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$21MCommunity Improvement$3.8MScience & Tech$1.2MEducation$200k
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $6,101,249, the rows itemized in this filing. The $8,416,575 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,315,326 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $67k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $834k
  • $250k+5 grants · $5.2M
$140,217
Median grant
8
States reached
$169M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CMMP PC$3,826,167
CMMP PLLC$430,538
THE JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERISTY$343,270
RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF MENTAL HYGIENE INC$313,637
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$286,254
HUGO W MOSER RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT KENNEDY KRIEGER INC$197,091
RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK$165,838
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES$140,217
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$110,420
THE GEORGE WASHNIGTON UNIVERSITY$99,260
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$64,207
GRASSROOT SOCCER INC$57,033
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$27,923
WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL$16,051
NYU SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$11,901
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 20% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $286k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $64k → 22%CHILD MIND MEDICAL PRACTICE PC: $4.8M → 7%KAGGLE INC: $30k → 8%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $28k → 14%THE RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK: $60k → 14%NYU SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $18k → 17%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $110k → 14%THE GEORGE WASHNIGTON UNIVERSITY: $99k → 4%HUGO W MOSER RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT KENNEDY KRIEGER INC: $197k → 19%GRASSROOT SOCCER INC: $57k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $12k → 22%CHILD MIND MEDICAL PRACTICE PC: $4.0M → 7%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $140k → 14%RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF MENTAL HYGIENE INC: $314k → 14%NYU SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $12k → 17%THE JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $90k → 19%CHILD MIND MEDICAL PRACTICE PC: $4.0M → 7%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $21k → 14%CHILD MIND MEDICAL PRACTICE PLLC: $3.3M → 17%CMMP PC: $3.8M → 7%CMMP PLLC: $431k → 17%CHILD MIND MEDICAL PRACTICE PC: $3.4M → 7%WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL: $73k → 17%WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL: $16k → 17%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $13k → 17%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $11k → 17%RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK: $166k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
VA
MD

Grants abroad, by region: $1.5M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$1.4M · 91% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: IMPLEMENTATION AND TRAINING · ADVICE AND CONSULTATION · RESEARCH

South America$84k · 6% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: IMPLEMENTATION AND TRAINING

North America (Canada and Mexico)$25k · 2% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: RESEARCH

East Asia and the Pacific$24k · 2% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: RESEARCH

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$25M · 7 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

$25M
$90k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+33%

Still filing today

43%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $943k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthRecreation & SportsScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CHILD MIND MEDICAL PRACTICE PC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $20M
  • CM
    CHILD MIND MEDICAL PRACTICE PLLC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $3.8M · revenue -4%
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $434k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • TR
    The Research Foundation for The State University of New Yorkgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $60k · revenue +33%
  • KI
    KAGGLE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
2
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
3
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
4
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
5
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
6
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
7
Washington University

The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)

Education
8
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
9
University of Rochester

The provision of higher education in the liberal arts and sciences, medicine and dentistry, nursing and music; research; and charitable patient care services.

Education
10
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
11
The Graduate Center Foundation Inc

The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…

—
12
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The George Washington University; the most unlike its peers is Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILD MIND MEDICAL PRACTICE PC: $20,007,468 · OtherCHILD MIND MEDICAL PRACTICE PC+4 more: $338,442 · OtherCHILD MIND MEDICAL PRACTICE PLLC: $3,769,759 · HealthCHILD MIND MEDICA…RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE INC: $313,637 · HealthRESEARCH FOUNDATI…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $433,635 · EducationMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $286,254 · EducationResearch Foundation of the City University of New York: $165,838 · EducationThe George Washington University: $99,260 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $76,212 · EducationThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $60,382 · Education+1 more: $24,882 · EducationHUGO W MOSER RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT KENNEDY KRIEGER INC: $197,091 · Science & TechNorthwestern University: $110,420 · Recreation & SportsGRASSROOT SOCCER INC: $57,033 · Recreation & Sports
Other$20,345,910Health$4,083,396Education$1,146,463Science & Tech$197,091Recreation & Sports$167,453

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILD MIND MEDICAL PRACTICE PLLC: $3,769,759 over 2y, 10% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $433,635 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE INC: $313,637 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $286,254 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUGO W MOSER RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT KENNEDY KRIEGER INC: $197,091 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetResearch Foundation of the City University of New York: $165,838 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $110,420 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University: $99,260 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $76,212 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $60,382 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRASSROOT SOCCER INC: $57,033 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNew York University: $24,882 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Child Mind Institute Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Child Mind Institute Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Hugo W Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Child Mind Institute’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home