Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

New Jersey · Private foundation

Chicita Culberson Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$79k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
3
Grants FY2024
2
Organizations funded FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$23,675
Largest grant, FY2024
$31,567
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$3.8M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Education$61kEnvironment$36kFood & Nutrition$24k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2023 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Duke University$60,96720%
North Carolina Botanical Garden Foundation$12,60011%

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($47k), not named here.

Compare Chicita Culberson Charitable Trust with peer funders

About Chicita Culberson Charitable Trust

How much does Chicita Culberson Charitable Trust give?
Chicita Culberson Charitable Trust reported 3 grants totaling $78,917 in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does Chicita Culberson Charitable Trust fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2024, its largest causes are Education (50%), Environment (30%), Food & Nutrition (20%).
Who are Chicita Culberson Charitable Trust's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2023 to FY2024: Duke University ($61k), North Carolina Botanical Garden Foundation ($13k).
Does Chicita Culberson Charitable Trust accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Where is Chicita Culberson Charitable Trust based?
Chicita Culberson Charitable Trust is based in NJ.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 4 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Chicita Culberson’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home