· Public charity
Chi Psi Educational Trust Inc
The chi psi educational trust, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 15 grants below total $1,084,301 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,271,969 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $187,668 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k8 grants · $192k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $512k
- $250k+1 grant · $380k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHI PSI FRATERNITY | $380,000 |
| IOTA COURT PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION | $150,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA | $109,255 |
| ALPHA BETA OF CHI PSI ALUMNI CORP | $100,000 |
| ALPHA PSI DELTA CORPORATION OF CHI | $52,884 |
| WASHINGTON AND LEE UNIVERSITY | $50,000 |
| ALPHA ALPHA DELTA LODGE ASSOCIATION | $50,000 |
| THE CORP OF ALPHA ZETA DELTA OF CHI | $45,909 |
| EPSILON TRUSTEE CORPORATION | $41,700 |
| CHI PSI ASSOCIATION OF ALPHA ETA DE | $25,683 |
| ALPHA PSI OF CHI PSI OF CORNELL UNI | $22,700 |
| ALPHA XI ALUMNI ASSOCIATION | $20,000 |
| LUBBOCK CHI PSI LODGE GROUP LLC | $14,800 |
| ALPHA PI DELTA | $11,370 |
| ALPHA OMICRON OF CHI PSI CORPORATIO | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 96% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of 0% since the first grant, against -52% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $173k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CPCHI PSI FRATERNITY9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +25%
Washington and Lee University2× · 2024–2025 · $210k · revenue +53%- ICIOTA COURT PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION INC2× · 2024–2025 · $193k · revenue +96% · 69% of their budget
Funded once
- TRTHE ROBERT B PLUNKETT MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL TRUST INCone grant, 2024 · $240k
- ASALPHA SIGMA FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $165k · revenue -52% · 76% of their budget
- ATALPHA THETA DELTA ALUMNI BUILDING ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2024 · $80k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide a suitable social environment for collegiate members.
Housing for college fraternity
Alpha Gamma Delta is an international womens fraternity that promotes academic excellence philanthropic giving ongoing leadership and personal development and above all a spirit of loving sisterhood.
Provide a suitable social environment for collegiate members.
Provide housing for undergraduate chapter of a national collegiate social sorority.
Chapter housing leased to members to provide an environment for study, sleep, hygiene, meals and fellowship, suitable for the development of men attending the institute for education.
College Fraternity
Alpha Phi is a sisterhood of women supporting each other in lifelong achievement.
Georgia Alpha Housing Corporation was established to provide, encourage and support the education and housing needs for the Georgia Alpha chapter of the Phi Kappa Psi fraternity at the University of Georgia in Athens, GA.
To promote and encourage the ideals and common bonds of the chi psi brotherhood and friendship among its members by maintaining and providing opportunities and venues for social, recreational, educational and other activities.
Provide dormitory facilities to college students
To provide housing, meals, and a meeting place for social activities of college age women, members of gamma iota chapter of alpha delta pi sorority.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alpha Omicron of Chi Psi Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Iota Court Preservation Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHI PSI FRATERNITY ↗
- Who funds ALPHA NU TRUST FUND INC ↗
- Who funds EPSILON TRUSTEE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Washington and Lee University ↗
- Who funds IOTA COURT PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Alpha Xi Alumni Association ↗
- Who funds ALPHA SIGMA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALPHA OMICRON OF CHI PSI CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Corporation of Alpha Zeta Delta of Chi Psi ↗
- Who funds ALPHA THETA DELTA ALUMNI BUILDING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ALPHA PSI DELTA CORPORATION OF CHI PSI ↗
- Who funds ALPHA ALPHA DELTA OF CHI PSI LODGE ASSOC INC ↗
- Who funds ALPHA ETA DELTA OF CHI PSI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALPHA PSI CORP OF CHI PSI OF CORNELL UNI ↗
- Who funds ALPHA PSI OF CHI PSI EDU TRUST ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Chi Psi Educational Trust Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.