Skip to content
Chehebar Family Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Chehebar Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
751
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0152% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Religion$10MHuman Services$2.3MHealth$516kEducation$449kPhilanthropy$315kFood & Nutrition$314kInternational$150kArts & Culture$138kOther$0
02FY2024 · 751 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k690 grants · $930k
  • $10k–50k53 grants · $872k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $619k
  • $250k+2 grants · $569k
$613
Median grant
11
States reached
$9.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BARKAI YESHIVA$300,000
YESHIVA OF FLATBUSH$269,000
MAGEN DAVID YESHIVA$182,720
Individual grant recipient$157,310
YDE$100,500
SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND$75,000
SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM$53,002
CONGREGATION BNEI GABRIEL$50,000
SHORE AREA MIKVEH$36,000
KESHER INC$33,333
GESHER YEHUDA$33,333
Individual grant recipient$30,938
HKY KOL YAAKOB$28,000
AHAVAT SHALOM$26,750
SAFE FOUNDATION$26,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $444k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KEREN HATZEDAKA: $13k → 6%MOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER: $15k → 17%KEREN HATZEDAKA: $5k → 6%MISASKIM: $500 → 20%A TIME: $2k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $153k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $111k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $53k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $26k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $26k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $18k → 20%LEOVDEI HASHEM INC: $3k → 20%LA ARETZ: $3k → 20%MAREH KEREN TORAH: $2k → 20%LEOVDEI HASHEM INC: $2k → 20%MAREH KEREN TORAH: $2k → 20%DAAT TORAH: $2k → 20%A TIME: $1k → 20%A TIME: $1k → 20%MAREH KEREN TORAH: $1k → 20%CHAYIM ARUCHIM: $750 → 20%CHAYIM ARUCHIM: $750 → 20%CHAYIM ARUCHIM: $750 → 20%TIFERES BAIS YAAKOV: $650 → 20%LEOVDEI HASHEM INC: $500 → 20%MY SOLDIER: $500 → 20%ACHDUS FOUNDATION: $500 → 20%ACHDUS FOUNDATION: $360 → 20%AHAVA BABY: $1k → 20%ACHDUS FOUNDATION: $500 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 746 repeat orgs$4.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

746 repeat relationships: 581 still active in FY2024, 165 since wound down; 169 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

746
446

Total granted

$14M
$3.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+4%

Still filing today

12%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $308k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
ReligionPhilanthropyEducationHuman ServicesInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $467k · revenue +0%
  • TS
    THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $311k · revenue +18%
  • TS
    THE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $116k · revenue +167%

Funded once

  • YD
    YESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC
    one grant, 2021 · $1.0M · revenue 0%
  • YM
    YESHIVA MAGEN ABRAHAM INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1.0M
  • CR
    CONGREGATION RODFEH ZEDEK INC
    one grant, 2021 · $300k · revenue -46%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
3
Sherit Isroel
—
4
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
5
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
6
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
8
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
9
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
10
American Friends of Hamesorah Talmud Torah Inc

Charity and education in u.s. and israel

—
11
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
12
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tehilot Israel Inc; the most unlike its peers is Monmouth Medical Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

174 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 174 of the 1,363 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
36
Early backer (in before they grew)
163/174
Grantees still filing
96/174
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SPECIAL CHILDRENS CENTER: $1,126,000 · OtherTHE SPECIAL CHILDRENS CENTERYESHIVAH OF FLATBUSH: $1,076,800 · OtherYESHIVAH OF FLATBUSHYESHIVA MAGEN ABRAHAM INC: $1,000,000 · OtherYESHIVA MAGEN ABRAHAM INCSYNAGOGUE OF DEAL: $933,200 · OtherSYNAGOGUE OF DEALMAGEN DAVID YESHIVAH: $900,610 · OtherMAGEN DAVID YESHIVAHIndividual grant recipient: $683,380 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYDE: $459,300 · Other+160 more: $6,220,784 · Other+160 moreYESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC: $1,000,000 · ReligionYESHIVAT DAR…CONGREGATION RODFEH ZEDEK INC: $300,000 · ReligionCONGREGATION…MAGEN DAVID OF MANHATTAN: $200,000 · ReligionMAGEN DAVID …KETER ARAM TZOVA INC: $80,800 · ReligionSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $67,000 · Religion+4 more: $127,650 · Religion+4 moreBARKAI FOUNDATION INC: $636,500 · EducationMATTAN BASSETER INC: $104,000 · EducationTORAT MOSHE MALKA INC: $41,000 · Education+5 more: $103,000 · EducationSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $466,503 · Human ServicesBonei Olam Inc: $90,000 · Human Services+2 more: $32,600 · Human ServicesTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $311,000 · Food & NutritionUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $108,000 · PhilanthropySHUVU RETURN INC: $30,600 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF PEER HASHALOM: $28,350 · PhilanthropyTIFERET RABBI AKIVA: $26,600 · PhilanthropySHARRE TAVUNA: $23,400 · PhilanthropyTEHILOT ISRAEL INC: $17,400 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF SHEARIM HAMETSUYANIMINC: $15,000 · PhilanthropyCentral Fund of Israel: $69,950 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YA'ADIR TORAH: $23,600 · InternationalYAD DAVID INC: $22,700 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEHEBAR SEPHARDIC CENTER INC: $13,500 · International
Other$12,400,074Religion$1,775,450Education$884,500Human Services$589,103Food & Nutrition$311,000Philanthropy$249,350International$129,750

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetBARKAI FOUNDATION INC: $636,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $466,503 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $311,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetCONGREGATION RODFEH ZEDEK INC: $300,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetMAGEN DAVID OF MANHATTAN: $200,000 over 1y, 43% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC: $116,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $108,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMATTAN BASSETER INC: $104,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $94,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $90,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSAFE FOUNDATION INC: $88,152 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetKETER ARAM TZOVA INC: $80,800 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $69,950 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGESHER YEHUDA INC: $69,633 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $67,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetYeshivat Lev Torah: $48,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEV AHARON: $45,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetOR HACHAYIM INC: $42,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetTORAT MOSHE MALKA INC: $41,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR SEPHARDIC STUDIES: $37,951 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD YERUSHALAYIM: $33,350 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetKESHER INC: $33,333 over 1y, 21% of budgetSHUVU RETURN INC: $30,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE RECORDED TALMUD: $30,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF PEER HASHALOM: $28,350 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetDARCHEI DAVID FOUNDATION: $28,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTIFERET RABBI AKIVA: $26,600 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetKEREN YOM TOV INC: $26,300 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetYESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC: $26,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTIKVA CORP: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YA'ADIR TORAH: $23,600 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSHARRE TAVUNA: $23,400 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetNew York Cancer Center Inc: $23,100 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetYAD DAVID INC: $22,700 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPorat Yoseph Foundation: $21,950 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetZICHRON ELIYAHU INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMERCAVA INC: $18,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetMIGDAL OHR INTERNATIONAL INC: $18,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetKEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $17,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTEHILOT ISRAEL INC: $17,400 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR DAYANIM: $17,250 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $16,650 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTORAH ORE SEMINARY: $16,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF SHEARIM HAMETSUYANIMINC: $15,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetPEYLIM LEV LACHIM: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEHEBAR SEPHARDIC CENTER INC: $13,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC ↗
  • Who funds BARKAI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CONGREGATION RODFEH ZEDEK INC ↗
  • Who funds MAGEN DAVID OF MANHATTAN ↗
  • Who funds THE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds MATTAN BASSETER INC ↗
  • Who funds SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KETER ARAM TZOVA INC ↗
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
  • Who funds GESHER YEHUDA INC ↗
  • Who funds SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY ALLIANCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Fou…The Foop FoundationCentury 21 Associates…The Jimmy and Berta K…The Adjmi-Dwek Founda…Ralph J Harary Founda…The Amin and Lillian …The Setton FoundationThe Ralph S Gindi Fam…The Howard Hoffman & …Marbeh Shalom Foundat…Isaac & Marjorie Gind…
Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY179.1× affinity140 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Foop Foundation · Century 21 Associates Foundation Inc · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · The Adjmi-Dwek Foundation Inc · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · The Setton Foundation · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chehebar Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chehebar Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 170%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Orchos Chaim Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
17get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Chehebar Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Chehebar Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1363 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Chehebar Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home