Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charles R Ingerson Family Foundation 30313202

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$18k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$47kEducation$27kHealth$14kAnimals$13kRecreation & Sports$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$338k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$6,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ABERDEEN$5,000
ABERDEEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$3,000
ABERDEEN AREA HUMANE SOCIETY$2,042
AVERA HOME HOSPICE$1,000
ABERDEEN LIONS CLUB$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WGA 4 KIDS: $1k → 6%AVERA HOME HOSPICE: $1k → 9%SOUTH DAKOTA PARKS & WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ABERDEEN: $6k → 11%AVERA HOME HOSPICE: $1k → 9%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ABERDEEN: $6k → 11%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ABERDEEN: $5k → 11%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ABERDEEN: $5k → 11%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ABERDEEN: $5k → 11%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ABERDEEN: $5k → 11%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ABERDEEN: $5k → 11%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ABERDEEN: $5k → 11%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ABERDEEN: $5k → 11%ABERDEEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%ABERDEEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%ABERDEEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%ABERDEEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%ABERDEEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%ABERDEEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%ABERDEEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%ABERDEEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%ABERDEEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%ABERDEEN AREA HUMANE SOCIETY: $2k → 11%ABERDEEN AREA HUMANE SOCIETY: $2k → 11%ABERDEEN AREA HUMANE SOCIETY: $2k → 11%NORTHERN PLAINS HOSPICE: $2k → 11%NORTHERN PLAINS HOSPICE: $2k → 11%NORTHERN PLAINS HOSPICE: $2k → 11%NORTHERN PLAINS HOSPICE: $2k → 11%NORTH PLAINS HOSPICE: $2k → 11%ABERDEEN AREA HUMANE SOCIETY: $1k → 11%ABERDEEN AREA HUMANE SOCIETY: $1k → 11%ABERDEEN AQUA ADDICTS: $1k → 11%ABERDEEN AQUA ADDICTS: $1k → 11%ABERDEEN AREA HUMANE SOCIETY: $1k → 11%ABERDEEN RURAL FIREFIGHTERS: $1k → 11%ABERDEEN AREA HUMANE SOCIETY: $1k → 11%ABERDEEN AREA HUMANE SOCIETY: $1k → 11%ABERDEEN AQUA ADDICTS: $1k → 11%ABERDEEN AREA HUMANE SOCIETY: $1k → 11%NORTH PLAINS HOSPICE: $1k → 11%NORTHERN PLAINS HOSPICE: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$152k · 8 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +129% since the first grant, against +89% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

$152k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+129%
+89%

Still filing today

38%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    9× · 2017–2025 · $49k
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ABERDEEN AREA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $46k · revenue -32%
  • AP
    ABERDEEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $27k · revenue +129%

Funded once

  • AR
    ABERDEE RURAL FIRE FIGHTERS
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -13%
  • SD
    SOUTH DAKOTA PARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +89%
  • W4
    WGA 4 KIDS
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
3/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $49,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ABERDEEN AREA INC: $46,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ABERDEEN AREA INCIndividual grant recipient: $9,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+7 more: $12,200 · Other+7 moreABERDEEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $27,000 · EducationABERDEEN PUBLIC SCH…ABERDEEN AREA HUMANE SOCIETY: $12,980 · AnimalsABERDEEN …
Other$116,200Education$27,000Animals$12,980

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ABERDEEN AREA INC: $46,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetABERDEEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $27,000 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetABERDEEN AREA HUMANE SOCIETY: $12,980 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetABERDEE RURAL FIRE FIGHTERS: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ABERDEEN AREA INC ↗
  • Who funds ABERDEEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ABERDEEN AREA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ABERDEE RURAL FIRE FIGHTERS ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH DAKOTA PARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charles R Ingerson Family Foundation 30313202 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charles R Ingerson Family Foundation 30313202. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Charles R Ingerson Family Foundation 30313202’s filings →

    More from the funding graph