· Private foundation
Charles M & Gloria Parrish Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k49 grants · $204k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $143k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $120k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HERITAGE FOUNDATION | $120,000 |
| UTAH SYMPHONY | $35,000 |
| WASHINGTON POLICY CENTER | $25,000 |
| AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE | $21,500 |
| THE CATO INSTITUTE | $21,500 |
| MUSEUM OF FLIGHT | $17,200 |
| ABILITY FOUND | $12,000 |
| CROSSROADS URBAN CENTER | $11,000 |
| JUNIOR LEAGUE OF UTAH | $8,600 |
| FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | $8,000 |
| GINA BACHAUER INTERNATL PIANO FNDT | $8,000 |
| NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF UTAH | $8,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF UTAH CRIMSON CLUB | $7,500 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF PUGET SOUND | $7,000 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF UTAH | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $160k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
76 repeat relationships — 54 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +63%- WPWASHINGTON POLICY CENTER8× · 2017–2024 · $240k · revenue +140%
- USUTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA8× · 2017–2024 · $235k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- IPINTERNATIONAL PIANO FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $10k
- AMADOPT ME SOCIETYone grant, 2017 · $5k
- SRSammamish Rowing Associationgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +41%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To support our members and promote the growth and quality of oregon's technology industry by providing opportunities for business and professional development through networking and informational programs.
The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Our mission is inspiring conservation of our marine environment.
The sacramento zoo inspires appreciation, respect and a connection with wildlife and nature through education, recreation and conservation.
Life science washington is a non-profit trade and professional association dedicated to promoting innovation and responsible growth in the life sciences and biomedical industries in the state of washington. promotion and education are…
See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…
To present symphonic music of the highest quality in a distinctive way for the cultural enrichment, education, engagement and enjoyment of the people of our community.
Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.
We are a community of cpas and financial professionals cultivating authentic relationships, unique learning experiences, and purposeful advocacy for our future.
To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.
Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Misunderstood Mutts Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON POLICY CENTER ↗
- Who funds UTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA ↗
- Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF FLIGHT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds ABILITY FOUND CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds UTAH ANIMAL ADOPTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF WESTERN WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF SALT LAKE CITYINC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF PUGET SOUND ↗
- Who funds Crossroads Urban Center ↗
- Who funds PET PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds CONSERVATION NW ↗
- Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WENATCHEE VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST ORGANIZATION FOR ANIMAL HELP ↗
- Who funds THE ORCHESTRA OF SOUTHERN UTAH ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MORONGO BASIN HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF TRACY AVIARY ↗
- Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Junior Achievement of Utah & Idaho ↗
- Who funds Jubilee REACH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · United Way of King County · Seattle Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Castle Foundation Co Greg Phillips · Henry W & Leslie M Eskuche Charitable Foundation · Kennecott Utah Copper Visitors Center Charitable Foundation · Cross Charitable Foundation Attn John R Clark
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Charles M & Gloria Parrish Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.