Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charles M Bair Memorial Trust US Bank Trust Dept

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$575k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$4.8MEducation$4.5MReligion$751kCommunity Improvement$49kOther$0
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k30 grants · $659k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $521k
  • $250k+1 grant · $575k
$22,693
Median grant
2
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BILLINGS CLINIC FOUNDATION$575,000
WHEATLAND MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE$230,000
MOUNTAINVIEW MEDICAL CENTER INC$115,000
FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST MOTHER CHURCH$64,500
Individual grant recipient$61,749
FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST$50,000
Individual grant recipient$45,823
Individual grant recipient$36,984
Individual grant recipient$34,170
Individual grant recipient$34,014
Individual grant recipient$30,538
Individual grant recipient$27,326
Individual grant recipient$26,239
Individual grant recipient$26,088
Individual grant recipient$25,206
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 36% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST MOTHER CHURCH: $120k → 16%BILLINGS CLINIC FOUNDATION: $720k → 9%MOUNTAINVIEW MEDICAL CENTER INC: $160k → 15%WHEATLAND MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE: $230k → 20%FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST MOTHER CHURCH: $65k → 16%SCHOLARSHIPS TO VARIOUS RECIPIENTS - SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE: $717k → 9%MOUNTAINVIEW MEDICAL CENTER INC: $115k → 15%WHEATLAND MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE: $200k → 20%FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST MOTHER CHURCH: $60k → 16%SCHOLARSHIPS TO VARIOUS RECIPIENTS - SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE: $667k → 9%MOUNTAINVIEW MEDICAL CENTER INC: $105k → 15%WHEATLAND MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE: $200k → 20%FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST MOTHER CHURCH: $60k → 16%BILLINGS CLINIC FOUNDATION: $575k → 9%MOUNTAINVIEW MEDICAL CENTER INC: $96k → 15%WHEATLAND MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE: $160k → 20%FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST MOTHER CHURCH: $53k → 16%BILLINGS CLINIC FOUNDATION: $500k → 9%MOUNTAINVIEW MEDICAL CENTER INC: $80k → 15%WHEATLAND MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE: $80k → 20%FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST MOTHER CHURCH: $50k → 16%BILLINGS CLINIC FOUNDATION: $400k → 9%MOUNTAINVIEW MEDICAL CENTER INC: $67k → 15%WHEATLAND MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE: $67k → 20%FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST MOTHER CHURCH: $50k → 16%BILLINGS CLINIC FOUNDATION: $360k → 9%MOUNTAINVIEW MEDICAL CENTER INC: $65k → 15%WHEATLAND MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE: $65k → 20%BILLINGS CLINIC FOUNDATION: $300k → 9%SHANE OGLE: $59k → 15%TAYT HANSEN: $39k → 20%BILLINGS CLINIC FOUNDATION: $290k → 9%DAWSON CLAYTON: $38k → 15%SHAYDEN TODHUNTER: $29k → 20%FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST: $60k → 9%MORGAN VAISVILAS: $37k → 15%MELANIE POWER: $23k → 20%FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST: $50k → 9%MEGAN OGLE: $33k → 15%TAYLEE BORNONG: $20k → 20%FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST: $50k → 9%JOSHUA PHILLIPS: $20k → 15%ERIC REED: $20k → 20%FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST: $50k → 9%FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST: $30k → 9%FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST: $27k → 9%FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST: $27k → 9%MOSES KITTS: $26k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.5M · 51 repeat orgs$284k to everyone else

51 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
11

Total granted

$8.5M
$143k

Still filing today

6%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BILLINGS CLINIC FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $3.1M · revenue +79%
  • WM
    WHEATLAND MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +53%
  • MM
    MOUNTAINVIEW MEDICAL CENTER INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $688k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $33k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $29k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $19k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/4
Grantees still filing
4/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BILLINGS CLINIC FOUNDATION: $3,145,000 · OtherBILLINGS CLINIC FOUNDATIONFIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST MOTHER CHURCH: $457,000 · OtherFIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST MOTHER CHURCHFIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST: $294,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $277,923 · Other+63 more: $2,851,111 · Other+63 moreWHEATLAND MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE: $1,001,500 · HealthWHEATLAND MEMORIAL HE…MOUNTAINVIEW MEDICAL CENTER INC: $688,017 · HealthMOUNTAINVIEW MEDICAL …COLTER PASS COOKE CITY SILVER GATE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $49,104 · Community Improvement
Other$7,025,034Health$1,689,517Community Improvement$49,104

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBILLINGS CLINIC FOUNDATION: $3,145,000 over 7y, 4.9% of budgetWHEATLAND MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE: $1,001,500 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetMOUNTAINVIEW MEDICAL CENTER INC: $688,017 over 7y, 2.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BILLINGS CLINIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WHEATLAND MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAINVIEW MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COLTER PASS COOKE CITY SILVER GATE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charles M Bair Memorial Trust US Bank Trust Dept funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charles M Bair Memorial Trust US Bank Trust Dept. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Charles M Bair Memorial Trust US Bank Trust Dept’s filings →

    More from the funding graph