Skip to content
Charles M & Gloria Parrish Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Charles M & Gloria Parrish Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$468k
Granted FY2024still arriving
57
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Public Benefit$1.5MArts & Culture$744kAnimals$360kYouth Development$253kSocial Science$202kRecreation & Sports$167kHuman Services$140kInternational$125kOther$0
02FY2024 · 57 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k49 grants · $204k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $143k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $120k
$4,300
Median grant
11
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HERITAGE FOUNDATION$120,000
UTAH SYMPHONY$35,000
WASHINGTON POLICY CENTER$25,000
AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE$21,500
THE CATO INSTITUTE$21,500
MUSEUM OF FLIGHT$17,200
ABILITY FOUND$12,000
CROSSROADS URBAN CENTER$11,000
JUNIOR LEAGUE OF UTAH$8,600
GINA BACHAUER INTERNATL PIANO FNDT$8,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$8,000
NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF UTAH$8,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH CRIMSON CLUB$7,500
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF PUGET SOUND$7,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF UTAH$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $160k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GUIDING EYES FOR BLIND: $1k → 9%THERAPY ANIMALS OF UTAH: $1k → 8%GUIDING EYES FOR BLIND: $1k → 9%THERAPY ANIMALS OF UTAH: $1k → 8%GUIDING EYES FOR BLIND: $1k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR BLIND: $1k → 9%UPLIFT NORTHWEST: $5k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR BLIND: $1k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR BLIND: $1k → 9%UPLIFT NORTHWEST: $4k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR BLIND: $1k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR BLIND: $860 → 9%ABILITY FOUND: $12k → 8%ABILITY FOUND: $12k → 8%ABILITY FOUND: $12k → 8%CROSSROADS URBAN CENTER: $11k → 8%ABILITY FOUND: $10k → 8%CROSSROADS URBAN CENTER: $11k → 8%ABILITY FOUND: $10k → 8%CROSSROADS URBAN CENTER: $11k → 8%ABILITY FOUND: $7k → 8%CROSSROADS URBAN CENTER: $9k → 8%ABILITY FOUND: $5k → 8%CROSSROADS URBAN CENTER: $5k → 8%ABILITY FOUND: $5k → 8%CROSSROADS URBAN CENTER: $5k → 8%HOPELINK: $2k → 9%HOPELINK: $2k → 9%HOPELINK: $2k → 9%HOPELINK: $2k → 9%HOPELINK: $2k → 9%HOPELINK: $2k → 9%HOPELINK: $2k → 9%HOPELINK: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
NY
OH
CA
UT
VA
MD
TN
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.1M · 76 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

76 repeat relationships: 54 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

76
4

Total granted

$4.1M
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+41%

Still filing today

58%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureAnimalsHuman ServicesPublic BenefitInternationalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +63%
  • WP
    WASHINGTON POLICY CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $240k · revenue +140%
  • US
    UTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $235k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • IP
    INTERNATIONAL PIANO FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • AM
    ADOPT ME SOCIETY
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • SR
    Sammamish Rowing Associationgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +41%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Technology Association of Oregon

To support our members and promote the growth and quality of oregon's technology industry by providing opportunities for business and professional development through networking and informational programs.

—
2
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
The Seattle Aquarium Society

Our mission is inspiring conservation of our marine environment.

Animals
5
Sacramento Zoological Society

The sacramento zoo inspires appreciation, respect and a connection with wildlife and nature through education, recreation and conservation.

Animals
6
Life Science Washington

Life science washington is a non-profit trade and professional association dedicated to promoting innovation and responsible growth in the life sciences and biomedical industries in the state of washington. promotion and education are…

—
7
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
8
Seattle Symphony Orchestra Inc

To present symphonic music of the highest quality in a distinctive way for the cultural enrichment, education, engagement and enjoyment of the people of our community.

Arts & Culture
9
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
10
Washington Society of Certified Public a

We are a community of cpas and financial professionals cultivating authentic relationships, unique learning experiences, and purposeful advocacy for our future.

—
11
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
12
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Misunderstood Mutts Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/47
Grantees still filing
35/47
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1,091,000 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATIONCATO INSTITUTE: $200,250 · Public BenefitCATO INSTITUTE+1 more: $8,060 · Public BenefitFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $76,000 · OtherPIONEER THEATER: $72,800 · OtherFREEDOM FOUNDATION: $64,480 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $61,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF PUGET SOUND: $55,800 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - CHIEF SEATTLE: $51,300 · OtherWSU COUGAR ATHLETIC FUND: $50,100 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WASHINGTON: $76,500 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF WESTERN WASHINGTON: $71,300 · OtherJUNIOR LEAGUE OF SALT LAKE CITYINC: $57,000 · Other+44 more: $823,570 · Other+44 moreUTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA: $234,500 · Arts & CultureUTAH SYMPHONY…MUSEUM OF FLIGHT FOUNDATION: $148,700 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF FLI…NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $42,360 · Arts & CultureNAVY SEAL FOU…MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $40,300 · Arts & CultureMEDIA RESEARC…+6 more: $43,100 · Arts & Culture+6 moreUTAH ANIMAL ADOPTION CENTER: $72,000 · AnimalsPET PARTNERS: $48,300 · AnimalsWENATCHEE VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $42,200 · AnimalsMORONGO BASIN HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $36,000 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF TRACY AVIARY: $31,800 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY: $12,000 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $12,000 · Animals+1 more: $5,500 · AnimalsWASHINGTON POLICY CENTER: $239,500 · Civil RightsAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $200,250 · Social ScienceABILITY FOUND CORPORATION: $73,000 · Human ServicesCrossroads Urban Center: $51,800 · Human ServicesHOPELINK: $16,100 · Human ServicesUPLIFT NORTHWEST: $9,300 · Human ServicesGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $8,060 · Human Services+1 more: $2,000 · Human Services
Public Benefit$1,299,310Other$1,459,850Arts & Culture$508,960Animals$259,800Civil Rights$239,500Social Science$200,250Human Services$160,260

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1,091,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON POLICY CENTER: $239,500 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetUTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA: $234,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $200,250 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $200,250 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM OF FLIGHT FOUNDATION: $148,700 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WASHINGTON: $76,500 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetABILITY FOUND CORPORATION: $73,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetUTAH ANIMAL ADOPTION CENTER: $72,000 over 8y, 9.2% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF WESTERN WASHINGTON: $71,300 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF SALT LAKE CITYINC: $57,000 over 6y, 3.7% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF PUGET SOUND: $55,800 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCrossroads Urban Center: $51,800 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetPET PARTNERS: $48,300 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $48,200 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVATION NW: $45,400 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $42,360 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWENATCHEE VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $42,200 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetMEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $40,300 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWEST ORGANIZATION FOR ANIMAL HELP: $40,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ORCHESTRA OF SOUTHERN UTAH: $39,200 over 8y, 9.8% of budgetWASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION: $37,800 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMORONGO BASIN HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $36,000 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF TRACY AVIARY: $31,800 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $25,800 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJunior Achievement of Utah & Idaho: $25,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetJubilee REACH: $23,800 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetIdaho Trails Association: $19,700 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetHOPELINK: $16,100 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPICKFORD FILM CENTER: $12,100 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY: $12,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRide 2 Recovery dba Project Hero: $12,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUPLIFT NORTHWEST: $9,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE OPERA: $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $8,060 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $8,060 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF OUR ARMED FORCES WALT VANBENTHYSEN: $8,060 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetMISUNDERSTOOD MUTTS RESCUE: $5,500 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetSEATTLE ART MUSEUM: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC NORTHWEST BALLET ASSOCIATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH PET PARTNERS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSammamish Rowing Association: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBELLEVUE ART MUSEUM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON POLICY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF FLIGHT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds ABILITY FOUND CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds UTAH ANIMAL ADOPTION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF WESTERN WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF SALT LAKE CITYINC ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF PUGET SOUND ↗
  • Who funds Crossroads Urban Center ↗
  • Who funds PET PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION NW ↗
  • Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WENATCHEE VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST ORGANIZATION FOR ANIMAL HELP ↗
  • Who funds THE ORCHESTRA OF SOUTHERN UTAH ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MORONGO BASIN HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF TRACY AVIARY ↗
  • Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Junior Achievement of Utah & Idaho ↗
  • Who funds Jubilee REACH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

George S and Dolores …M J Murdock Charitabl…United Way of King Co…Seattle FoundationSorenson Legacy Found…The Norcliffe Foundat…Lawrence & Janet Dee …Puget Sound Energy Fo…Castle Foundation Co …Henry W & Leslie M Es…Kennecott Utah Copper…Cross Charitable Foun…
George S and Dolores Dore Eccles FoundationUT25.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 7 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · United Way of King County · Seattle Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Castle Foundation Co Greg Phillips · Henry W & Leslie M Eskuche Charitable Foundation · Kennecott Utah Copper Visitors Center Charitable Foundation · Cross Charitable Foundation Attn John R Clark

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charles M & Gloria Parrish Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charles M & Gloria Parrish Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Charles M & Gloria Parrish’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home