Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charles D Bud Hering Jr Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$232kAnimals$8kPhilanthropy$3kHousing & Shelter$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$8,000
SENECA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$8,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%TIFFIN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION - GASE: $9k → 12%OTTIFFIN COMMUNITY KITCHEN: $8k → 12%TIFFIN COMMUNITY KITCHEN: $8k → 12%SENECA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $8k → 12%LAUREN GABEL - TIFFIN UNIVERSITY: $6k → 12%HANNAH CHAFFEE - OHIO STATE: $5k → 12%HANNAH CHAFFEE - OHIO STATE: $5k → 12%LILY HAMMER - ASHLAND: $5k → 12%MADELYN DICKMAN - OHIO UNIVERSITY: $5k → 12%ANNA FLETCHER - OHIO UNIVERSITY: $4k → 12%ALEC DEMITH U OF CINCINNATI: $4k → 12%JULIE PECK OSU: $4k → 12%KADEN SNAY - ASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $3k → 12%ALEXANDRIA HAUSMAN - OHIO STATE UNI: $3k → 12%RYAN ADELSPERGER - OHIO STATE: $3k → 12%JULIE REINHART - KENT STATE: $3k → 12%JULIE PECK OSU: $3k → 12%CADENCE BROWN - CEDARVILLE UNIV: $3k → 12%JULIE REINHART - KENT STATE UNIV: $3k → 12%BITTANI STILTNER - OHIO WESLEYAN: $3k → 12%MADELYN DICKMAN - OHIO UNIVERSITY: $3k → 12%LUKE RITZLER - OHIO UNIV: $3k → 12%KADIN SNAY - ASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $3k → 12%KATELYN ARBOGAST - OWENS COMM COLLE: $3k → 12%ALEXANDRIA HAUSMAN - OHIO STATE UNI: $3k → 12%BOBBIE HALL - MIAMI UNIVESITY: $3k → 12%CADENCE BROWN - CEDARVILLE UNIV: $3k → 12%TIFFIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%CADENCE BROWN - CEDARVILLE UNIV: $3k → 12%ALEXANDRIA HAUSMAN - OHIO STATE UNI: $3k → 12%BUCYRUS-TIFFIN YMCA: $3k → 12%BITTANI STILTNER - OHIO WESLEYAN: $3k → 12%SENECA COUNTY COUNCIL ON HOMELESSNE: $3k → 12%JENNA GABEL - MARION TECH: $3k → 12%MARIANNA PENNYCUFF - BGSU: $3k → 12%ALEXANDRIA HAUSMAN - OHIO STATE UNI: $3k → 12%TIFFIN COMMUNITY KITCHEN: $3k → 12%MADELYN DICKMAN - OHIO UNIVERSITY: $3k → 12%ANNA FLETCHER - THE OHIO STATE UNIV: $3k → 12%BOBBIE HALL MIAMI UNIVERSITY: $3k → 12%KADIN SNAY - ASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $3k → 12%KATELYN ARBOGAST - OWENS COMM COLLE: $3k → 12%LUKE RITZLER - OHIO UNIV: $3k → 12%RYAN STRAUSBAUGH UT: $3k → 12%BITTANI STILTNER - OHIO WESLEYAN: $3k → 12%TIFFIN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION - GASE: $3k → 12%M ZIMMERMAN - HEIDELBERG UNIVERSIT: $3k → 12%LUKE RITZLER - OHIO UNIV: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$190k · 25 repeat orgs$61k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
17

Total granted

$190k
$41k

Still filing today

0%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2019–2022 · $12k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2021–2024 · $12k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2020–2023 · $12k

Funded once

  • TT
    THE TIFFIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +1%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
1/2
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherTIFFIN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION - GASE: $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherM ZIMMERMAN - HEIDELBERG UNIVERSIT: $11,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $11,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $9,000 · Other+34 more: $128,615 · Other+34 moreTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF SENECA COUNTY: $8,000 · AnimalsTHE TIFFIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Philanthropy
Other$240,615Animals$8,000Philanthropy$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF SENECA COUNTY: $8,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE TIFFIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF SENECA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds THE TIFFIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charles D Bud Hering Jr Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charles D Bud Hering Jr Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Charles D Bud Hering Jr Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Charles D Bud Hering Jr Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Charles D Bud Hering Jr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph