Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charles and Elizabeth Schellhorn Private Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$100k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$307kReligion$46kPhilanthropy$37kHealth$26kSocial Science$25kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kRecreation & Sports$3kFood & Nutrition$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARVARD COLLEGE FUND$50,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER KANSAS CITY$5,096
HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL$5,000
VILLAGE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$5,000
WELLESLEY COLLEGE FUND$5,000
THE GRAND COUNTY FOUNDATION (THE WILDFIRE EMERGENCY FUND)$5,000
KANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
ST ANN'S CATHOLIC CHURCH$5,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$3,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND$3,000
NO KID HUNGRY$2,000
INFINITE STRENGTH$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 35% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WELLESLEY COLLEGE FUND: $5k → 7%Harvard College Fund: $50k → 8%HARVARD COLLEGE FUND: $50k → 16%NO KID HUNGRY: $2k → 14%ST ANN'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $5k → 5%KANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT: $5k → 15%WICHITA PUBLIC RADIO: $5k → 16%University of Kansas Medical System: $5k → 16%Rockhurst University: $5k → 15%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND: $3k → 9%INFINITE STRENGTH: $2k → 12%GRAND COUNTY FOUNDATION (THE WILDFIRE EMERGENCY FUND): $10k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME: $3k → 13%US NAVAL ACADEMY: $3k → 6%WELLESLEY COLLEGE FUND: $5k → 7%HARVARD COLLEGE FUND: $50k → 8%HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL: $5k → 16%Village Presbyterian Church: $5k → 5%UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL SYSTEM: $5k → 16%Rockhurst University: $5k → 15%GRAND COUNTY FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%WELLESLEY COLLEGE FUND: $5k → 7%HARVARD COLLEGE FUND: $50k → 8%Harvard Business School: $5k → 16%St Ann's Catholic Church: $5k → 5%UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL SYSTEM: $5k → 16%GRAND COUNTY FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%Wellesley College Fund: $5k → 7%Harvard College Fund: $50k → 8%HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL: $5k → 16%St Ann's Catholic Church: $5k → 5%University of Kansas Medical System: $5k → 16%The Pembroke Hill School: $10k → 15%THE GRAND COUNTY FOUNDATION (THE WILDFIRE EMERGENCY FUND): $5k → 7%Wellesley College Fund: $5k → 7%Harvard Business School: $5k → 16%Village Presbyterian Church: $5k → 5%UNITED WAY OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $5k → 15%GRAND COUNTY FOUNDATION (THE WILDFIRE EMERGENCY FUND): $5k → 7%HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL: $5k → 16%ST ANN'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $5k → 5%United Way of Greater Kansas City: $5k → 15%ST ANN'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $5k → 5%UNITED WAY OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $5k → 15%VILLAGE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $5k → 5%United Way of Greater Kansas City: $5k → 15%VILLAGE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $5k → 5%UNITED WAY OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MA
IN
CT
CO
MO
MD
KS
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$444k · 11 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

$444k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+2%

Still filing today

27%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HARVARD COLLEGE FUND
    5× · 2020–2024 · $250k
  • UW
    United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $25k · revenue +1%
  • HB
    HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL
    5× · 2020–2024 · $25k

Funded once

  • UN
    US NAVAL ACADEMY
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • HH
    HEAD HEARTS & HANDS GUIDANCE AT THE CROSSROADS DECISIONS
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • HM
    HARVARD MAGAZINE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $250 · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame

The corporation of saint mary's college, notre dame (saint mary's) is a catholic, residential, women's, liberal arts college offering undergraduate degrees and co-educational graduate programs. (continued in schedule o)

Education
2
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
5
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

—
8
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
9
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
10
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
11
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
12
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rockhurst University; the most unlike its peers is Infinite Strength Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HARVARD COLLEGE FUND: $250,000 · OtherHARVARD COLLEGE FUNDUnited Way of Greater Kansas City Inc: $25,096 · OtherUnited Way of Greater Kansas City IncHARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL: $25,000 · OtherHARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOLWELLESLEY COLLEGE FUND: $25,000 · OtherWELLESLEY COLLEGE FUNDST ANN'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $25,000 · OtherST ANN'S CATHOLIC CHURCHUniversity of Kansas Medical System: $20,000 · OtherVillage Presbyterian Church: $20,000 · OtherGRAND COUNTY FOUNDATION (THE WILDFIRE EMERGENCY FUND): $20,000 · Other+7 more: $28,750 · Other+7 morePEMBROKE HILL SCHOOL: $14,000 · EducationROCKHURST UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $2,500 · EducationPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND INC: $3,000 · HealthINFINITE STRENGTH INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyHARVARD MAGAZINE INC: $250 · Arts & Culture
Other$438,846Education$26,500Health$3,000Philanthropy$2,000Arts & Culture$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUnited Way of Greater Kansas City Inc: $25,096 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPEMBROKE HILL SCHOOL: $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetROCKHURST UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINFINITE STRENGTH INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARVARD MAGAZINE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc ↗
  • Who funds PEMBROKE HILL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ROCKHURST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds INFINITE STRENGTH INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
  • Who funds HARVARD MAGAZINE INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charles and Elizabeth Schellhorn Private Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charles and Elizabeth Schellhorn Private Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Planned Parenthood of Southern New England Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Charles and Elizabeth Schellhorn Private’s filings →

More from the funding graph