Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charleigh Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$620k
Granted FY2025still arriving
57
Grants FY2025still arriving
20
States reached
$131k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$1.4MHealth$701kEducation$339kEnvironment$181kArts & Culture$162kPhilanthropy$100kCommunity Improvement$92kInternational$84kOther$0
02FY2025 · 57 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k35 grants · $64k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $375k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $181k
$5,000
Median grant
20
States reached
$602k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEST RIVER COMMUNITY PROJECT$130,527
FOOD CONNECTS$50,000
CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE$42,500
WHOLESOME WAVE$33,333
WESTON A PRICE FOUNDATION$32,500
THURGOOD MARSHALL COLLEGE FUND$30,000
WILLISTEAD MANOR INC$25,000
NOFA VT$25,000
FLORIDA AM ALUMNI ASS OF PALM BEACH$20,000
COMMON ROOTS$20,000
HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY$16,420
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$15,000
USA for UNFPA$15,000
LEAVE IT BETTER FOUNDATION$15,000
HEALTH FREEDOM DEFENSE FUND$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MERCY CHEFS: $500 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
ID
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
NJ
CT
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
DE
NM
TN
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 17% of Charleigh Charitable Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 17% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 14%.

Charleigh Charitable Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.9% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 74 repeat orgs$389k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

74 repeat relationships: 39 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

74
56

Total granted

$2.9M
$335k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
0%

Still filing today

61%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    THE WESTON A PRICE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $187k · revenue +63%
  • TM
    Thurgood Marshall College Fund
    4× · 2022–2025 · $180k · revenue +28%
  • RO
    Real Organic Project Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $120k · revenue +262%

Funded once

  • SC
    SUNDRY CONTRIBUTIONS SMALL AMOUNTS
    one grant, 2020 · $64k
  • AH
    AFRICAN HERITAGE ECONOMIC INITIATIV
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • TE
    TRUE EATS LOCAL FOOD EDUCATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -91%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northeast Organic Farming Association of New Hampshire

NOFA-NH actively promotes organic, regenerative, ecologically sound farming, gardening, eating, and land care practices for healthy communities. NOFA-NH helps people build local, just, and sustainable food systems.

Food & Nutrition
2
Vermont Fresh Network Corporation

Advancing relationships among farmers, chefs, and consumers to grow markets and eat more locally grown food.

Community Improvement
3
Organic Farmers Association

The mission of the Organic Farmers Association is to provide a strong and unified national voice for domestic certified organic producers so that organic agriculture will become the basis of a viable United States food and agricultural…

Food & Nutrition
4
Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc

Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements

Food & Nutrition
5
Northeast Organic Farming Association of Vermont

The northeast organic farming association of vermont promotes organic practices to build an ecomnomically viable, ecologically sound and socially just vermont agricultural system that benefits all living things.

Arts & Culture
6
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
7
Vermont Institute of Natural Science Inc

The mission of vins is to motivate individuals and communities to care for the environment through education, research, and avian wildlife rehabilitation.

Environment
8
Liberation Ecosystem Inc

To cultivate connection, share resources, and amplify the voices of people of color in vermont within the focus areas of land, environ- ment, agriculture, and foodways. liberation ecosystem, inc. is a col- laborative ecosystem for growing…

Food & Nutrition
9
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
10
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
11
New England Dairy and Food Council

Provide the latest science-based nutrition information and research to a variety of audiences, develop effective and exciting nutrition and wellness programs, and educate consumers, media, educators, school administrators and health…

—
12
Grist Magazine Inc

Grist is an independent, non profit media organization dedicated to reporting on climate change.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hawthorne Valley Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is Holistic Manangement International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

88 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 88 of the 149 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
84/88
Grantees still filing
46/88
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WEST RIVER COMMUNITY PROJECT: $751,127 · OtherWEST RIVER COMMUNITY PROJECTNOFA VT: $125,000 · OtherNOFA VTWILLISTEAD MANOR INC: $75,000 · OtherSUNDRY CONTRIBUTIONS SMALL AMOUNTS: $63,867 · OtherVERMONT AGENCY OF AGRICULTURE: $60,100 · OtherCOMMON ROOTS: $60,000 · Other+92 more: $658,283 · Other+92 moreCHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE: $371,700 · EnvironmentCHILDREN'S HEALTH D…Real Organic Project Inc: $120,000 · EnvironmentReal Organic Projec…WHOLESOME WAVE INC: $66,666 · EnvironmentWHOLESOME WAVE INC+9 more: $21,176 · EnvironmentThurgood Marshall College Fund: $180,000 · EducationThurgood Ma…UNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $40,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY …VERMONT ACADEMY: $30,000 · EducationVERMONT ACA…STERLING COLLEGE: $30,000 · EducationSTERLING CO…THE NIGERIAN SCHOOL PROJECT: $20,000 · EducationTHE NIGERIA…RURAL EDUCATION ACTION PROJECT: $16,500 · Education+6 more: $23,250 · Education+6 moreTHE WESTON A PRICE FOUNDATION: $187,000 · Food & NutritionTHE WESTON…FOOD CONNECTS: $75,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD CONNE…TRUE EATS LOCAL FOOD EDUCATION INC: $25,000 · Food & NutritionTRUE EATS …+2 more: $8,500 · Food & NutritionNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $62,500 · HealthSOJOURNS COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $30,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $30,000 · HealthCarlos G Otis Health Care Center: $25,000 · HealthAUTISM TRUST USA: $10,000 · HealthTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $6,000 · Health+5 more: $11,640 · HealthHEALTH FREEDOM DEFENSE FUND INC: $40,000 · Civil RightsFOOD FREEDOM FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL COALITION AGAINST CENSORSHIP INC: $10,000 · Civil Rights+1 more: $2,500 · Civil RightsNicholas Pedone Foundation: $28,000 · PhilanthropyHOLISTIC MANANGEMENT INTERNATIONAL: $25,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyChicago Blackhawks Foundation: $5,000 · PhilanthropyHOPE FOR YOUTH FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Philanthropy+2 more: $1,300 · Philanthropy
Other$1,793,377Environment$579,542Education$339,750Food & Nutrition$295,500Health$175,140Civil Rights$82,500Philanthropy$71,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE: $371,700 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetTHE WESTON A PRICE FOUNDATION: $187,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetThurgood Marshall College Fund: $180,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetReal Organic Project Inc: $120,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetFOOD CONNECTS: $75,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetWHOLESOME WAVE INC: $66,666 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $62,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUSA FOR UNFPA INC: $52,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH FREEDOM DEFENSE FUND INC: $40,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetFOOD FREEDOM FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetGrace Cottage Foundation: $30,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSOJOURNS COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetHURU INTERNATIONAL INC: $30,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetVERMONT ACADEMY: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTERLING COLLEGE: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNicholas Pedone Foundation: $28,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetHOLISTIC MANANGEMENT INTERNATIONAL: $25,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCarlos G Otis Health Care Center: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRUE EATS LOCAL FOOD EDUCATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAGRITECH INSTITUTE FOR SMALL FARMS INC: $22,000 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetTHE NIGERIAN SCHOOL PROJECT: $20,000 over 2y, 79% of budgetRURAL EDUCATION ACTION PROJECT: $16,500 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetThe Spikenard Farm Inc: $11,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetAUTISM TRUST USA: $10,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BERRY CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHAWTHORNE VALLEY ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL COALITION AGAINST CENSORSHIP INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDOORS TO FREEDOM: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SYLVIA CENTER: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIFT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetETHAN ALLEN INSTITUTE: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetLONGHOUSE RESERVE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPINK BOOTS SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetChicago Blackhawks Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREEN MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY SCHOOL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPECONIC LAND TRUST INC: $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $3,040 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT BIOME INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE FOR YOUTH FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE ↗
  • Who funds THE WESTON A PRICE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Thurgood Marshall College Fund ↗
  • Who funds Real Organic Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOOD CONNECTS ↗
  • Who funds WHOLESOME WAVE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds USA FOR UNFPA INC ↗
  • Who funds FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH FREEDOM DEFENSE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FREEDOM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Grace Cottage Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SOJOURNS COMMUNITY CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds HURU INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds VERMONT ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds STERLING COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Nicholas Pedone Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HOLISTIC MANANGEMENT INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Carlos G Otis Health Care Center ↗
  • Who funds TRUE EATS LOCAL FOOD EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST ↗
  • Who funds AGRITECH INSTITUTE FOR SMALL FARMS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NIGERIAN SCHOOL PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds RURAL EDUCATION ACTION PROJECT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Vermont Community FoundationVT28.2× affinity14 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · Ben & Jerry's Foundation Inc · The Windham Foundation Inc · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Lintilhac Foundation Inc · Novo Foundation · Onufrychuk Family Charitable Trust · The Sandy River Charitable Foundation · Thomas Thompson Trust · Forrest C & Frances H Lattner Foundation · National Life Group Charitable Foundation Inc · Clif Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charleigh Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charleigh Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 130%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Vermont Historical Society: 51% of income from government
  • Agritech Institute for Small Farms Inc: 48% of income from government
  • Vermont Land Trust Inc: 42% of income from government
  • Bridges Outreach Inc: 25% of income from government
  • Food Connects: 15% of income from government
  • Sterling College: 10% of income from government
  • Neighborhood Connections Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Townshend Historical Society Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Real Organic Project Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Vermont Journalism Trust Ltd: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
13get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Charleigh Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Charleigh Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 149 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Charleigh’s filings →

More from the funding graph