· Public charity
Charityex Foundation Inc
CharityEx Foundation is a public charitable foundation dedicated to improving the lives of people.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 24 grants below total $350,978 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $520,454 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $169,476 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $70k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $224k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $57k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NORTHWEST YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL | $56,609 |
| SEATTLE HEBREW ACADEMY | $39,995 |
| Chabad House Community Center | $29,100 |
| Chabad Lubavitch of Springfield-Burke Virginia | $22,651 |
| NEW HAVEN HEBREW DAY SCHOOL INC | $18,195 |
| Israel Next Generation | $17,224 |
| JEWISH DISCOVERY CENTER | $16,893 |
| Lubavitch Educational Center | $16,580 |
| Congregation BH Inc | $14,545 |
| CHABAD AT RICE INC | $14,010 |
| OHOLEI YOSEF YITZCHOK LUBAVITCH INC | $12,993 |
| American Friends of Bnos Yehudis Inc | $11,500 |
| BAIS MENACHEM YOUTH | $10,495 |
| CHABAD AT BC INC | $8,551 |
| Yeshivas Lubavitch of Baltimore | $8,119 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 56% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $279k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FOFRIENDS OF CHABAD OF HEBRON INC2× · 2021–2022 · $328k · revenue -18%
- CHCHABAD HOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER2× · 2023–2024 · $107k
- CLCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF BRONXVILLE INC2× · 2021–2022 · $59k
Funded once
- CECamp Emunah Incone grant, 2021 · $28k
- NSNOSSONS SHUL INCone grant, 2021 · $25k
- FOFRIENDS OF KESHER FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2022 · $23k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Religious School
To provide secondary high school education in Brooklyn, NY
The Organization operates an religious outreach center to promote and understand Judaism and the laws of Kosher.
Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.
servicing the stamford Jewish community with religious and education programs
To provide children with an outstanding Jewish and Secular education.
A religious school providing teaching facilities of jewish faith, history, literature, jewish life and ideals.
To provide hebrew religious and secular education for elementary children in a warm and nurturing environment
Chabad NDG Inc is an organization dedicated to furthering the religious, educational, and charitable needs of the Jewish Community.
At Gesher Jewish Day School we inspire our students to be passionate about learning, practice justice, kindness and respect, aspire to a life guided by Jewish values, torah and community.
The jewish high school of connecticut is dedicated to educate jewish youth for whom jewish values and traditions shape and guide their lives and for whom learning and responsible actions are foundational for achievement.
Cheder Chabad - Philadelphia educates boys and girls from nursery through 8th grade with a dual curriculum in Jewish and General Studies
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chaya Aidel Seminary Inc and the most unlike its peers is Helping Restore Ability. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 11% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FRIENDS OF CHABAD OF HEBRON INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds NEW HAVEN HEBREW DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds THE OJC FUND ↗
- Who funds Seattle Hebrew Academy ↗
- Who funds Israel Next Generation INC ↗
- Who funds Jewish Discovery Center Inc ↗
- Who funds CONGREGATION BH INC ↗
- Who funds SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Oholei Yosef Yitzchok Lubavitch Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BNOS YEHUDIS IN ↗
- Who funds EAST VALLEY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · Nash Charity Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Chabad on Campus International Inc · Rebbe's Partnership Foundation · Crain-Maling Foundation · Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta Inc · Keren Tzemed · Keren Hachomesh Inc · The Rapoport Family Foundation Inc · Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael) Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Charityex Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.