Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charitable Economic Opportunity Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$34kPublic Safety & Disaster$12kFood & Nutrition$5kHealth$4kInternational$3kEducation$2kEnvironment$100Human Services$50
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100
Median grant
7
States reached
$321
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CROSSROADS UMC CHURCH$4,665
BELTON EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$2,000
CROSSROADS UMC CHURCH$2,000
CROSSROADS UMC CHURCH$1,750
Individual grant recipient$1,500
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATON$100
BRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS$100
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MAYO CLINIC$100
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITALS$100
SHRINERS HOSPITALS$100
UNICEF$75
SMILE TRAIN$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $50) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOYS TOWN: $50 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
NE
MO
KS
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$53k · 12 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
6

Total granted

$53k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+9%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
HealthInternationalEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1D
    5× · 2018–2024 · $1k · revenue +31%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    5× · 2018–2023 · $677 · revenue +125%
  • SMILE TRAIN INC
    4× · 2018–2025 · $550 · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • CU
    CROOSROADS UMC CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • OI
    OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2024 · $103 · revenue -5%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $100
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
2
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
3
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
4
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
5
Beth Israel Hospital & Children's Hospital Medical Care Corporation

Pediatric healthcare, education & research

—
6
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
7
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
8
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
9
Methodist Healthcare-Memphis Hospitals

Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…

Health
10
Blood Cancer United Inc

Our mission is to cure leukemia, lymphoma, hodgkin's disease and myeloma, and improve the quality of life of patients and their families.

Health
11
East Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc

East tennessee children's hospital is a free-standing, independent, not-for-profit pediatric health care system which serves the east tennessee region. children's hospital is certified by the state of tennessee as a comprehensive regional…

Health
12
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CROSSROADS UMC CHURCH: $44,113 · OtherCROSSROADS UMC CHURCHCOMMUNITY OF CHRIST: $5,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY OF CHRISTCROOSROADS UMC CHURCH: $2,000 · Other+10 more: $3,654 · Other+10 moreBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $1,074 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $677 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $350 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $200 · HealthThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $150 · HealthBELTON EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EducationOUTREACH INTERNATIONAL: $103 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $75 · InternationalFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $50 · Human Services
Other$54,767Health$2,451Education$2,000International$178Human Services$50

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $1,074 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $677 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $550 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOUTREACH INTERNATIONAL: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BELTON EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Children's Mercy Hospital ↗
  • Who funds OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charitable Economic Opportunity Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charitable Economic Opportunity Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Charitable Economic Opportunity Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Charitable Economic Opportunity Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Charitable Economic Opportunity’s filings →

More from the funding graph