Skip to content
Chapter No 78 at a glance

· Public charity

Chapter No 78

The mission of the ahepa organization is to promote hellenism, education, philanthropy, civic responsibility, family and individual excellence.

$72k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$96kHuman Services$73kEducation$14kHealth$11kPublic Benefit$7kFood & Nutrition$6kInternational$3kAnimals$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$566k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES$39,837
RILEY CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$7,350
AHEPH DISTRICT 12$7,260
ST MONICA CHURCH$3,000
INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN CHARITY$3,000
N W IND FOOD PANTRY$2,500
SOJOURNER TRUTH HOUSE$2,000
L C HUMANE SOCIETY$1,750
LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND$1,500
NORTYHWEST INDIANA PARKINSONS FOUND$1,500
CHRISTIAN HAVEN HOUSE$1,000
HEART ASSOCIATION AND OTHERS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SOJOURNER TRUTH HOUSE: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$179k · 3 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
1

Total granted

$179k
$34k

Still filing today

33%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyInternationalHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    AHEPA CARES
    2× · 2023–2024 · $70k
  • SC
    SS CONSTANTINE & HELEN GREEK ORTHODOX CATHEDRAL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $56k
  • NH
    National Hellenic Museum
    3× · 2023–2025 · $53k · revenue -33%

Funded once

  • VO
    VARIOUS OTHERS UNDER 5000
    one grant, 2023 · $34k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
2/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AHEPA CARES: $69,689 · OtherAHEPA CARESSS CONSTANTINE & HELEN GREEK ORTHODOX CATHEDRAL: $55,792 · OtherSS CONSTANTINE & HELEN GREEK ORTHODOX CATHEDRALVARIOUS OTHERS UNDER 5000: $34,084 · OtherVARIOUS OTHERS UNDER 5000AHEPH DISTRICT 12: $7,260 · Other+6 more: $10,750 · Other+6 moreNational Hellenic Museum: $53,337 · Arts & CultureNational Hellenic MuseumJames Whitcomb Riley Memorial Association: $7,350 · PhilanthropyINT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC: $3,000 · InternationalSojourner Truth House Inc: $2,000 · Human ServicesNWI PARKINSONS INC: $1,500 · Health
Other$177,575Arts & Culture$53,337Philanthropy$7,350International$3,000Human Services$2,000Health$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNational Hellenic Museum: $53,337 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetJames Whitcomb Riley Memorial Association: $7,350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF NORTHWEST INDIANA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF CROWN POINT (DISTRICT 6540CLUB 3351): $1,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments …
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA2.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chapter No 78 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chapter No 78. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Int'l Orthodox Christian Charities Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Chapter No 78?

Find your warmest path to Chapter No 78 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Chapter No 78’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home