Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

California · Public charity

Challenged Athletes Inc

It is the mission of the challenged athletes foundation to provide opportunities and support to people with physical disabilities so they can pursue active lifestyles through physical fitness and competitive athletics.the challenged athletes foundation believes that involvement in sports at any level increases self-esteem, encourages…

$4.1M
Granted FY2021
1
Itemized grants FY2021
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Challenged Athletes Inc’s FY2021 grant dollars went to The San Diego Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

0
’17
0
’18
0
’21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Itemized, FY2021
$5k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2021
$5,219
Largest grant, FY2021
$5,219
States reached, FY2021
1
Total assets, FY2021
$39M
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Philanthropy$497k

Top grantees

Largest grants in FY2021.

SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION$5,219

Compare Challenged Athletes Inc with peer funders

About Challenged Athletes Inc

How much does Challenged Athletes Inc give?
Challenged Athletes Inc reported 1 itemized grants totaling $5,219, out of $4,146,900 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2021 IRS filing.
What does Challenged Athletes Inc fund?
By grant dollars, its largest causes are Philanthropy (100%).
Where is Challenged Athletes Inc based?
Challenged Athletes Inc is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2026) is on record and reports $5.6M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2021, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Challenged Athletes’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home