Skip to content

California · Public charity

Chacruna Institute for Psychedelic Plant

We promote reciprocity in the psychedelic community, and support the protection of sacred plants and cultural traditions. We advance psychedelic justice through curating critical conversations and uplifting the voices of women, queer people, Indigenous peoples, people of color, and the Global South in the field of psychedelic science.

$177k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
1
Itemized grants FY2025
3
Organizations funded FY2024
33%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$23k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$23,125
Largest grant, FY2025
$23,125
Organizations funded a year
1 to 3
FY2022 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$225k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 33% of the organizations Chacruna Institute for Psychedelic Plant funded were first-time grantees, receiving 20% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving1$23k0%
FY20243$227k33%
FY20232$111k100%
FY20221$19kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Education$223kReligion$157k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2022 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Sacred Plant Alliance$156,7502n/a
Chacruna Institute for Psychedelic Plant$19,00013%

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($204k), not named here.

Compare Chacruna Institute for Psychedelic Plant with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Chacruna Institute for Psychedelic Plant?

Find your warmest path to Chacruna Institute for Psychedelic Plant through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Chacruna Institute for Psychedelic Plant

How much does Chacruna Institute for Psychedelic Plant give?
Chacruna Institute for Psychedelic Plant reported 1 itemized grants totaling $23,125, out of $177,045 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 3 organizations a year over FY2022 to FY2024.
What does Chacruna Institute for Psychedelic Plant fund?
By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (59%), Religion (41%).
Who are Chacruna Institute for Psychedelic Plant's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2022 to FY2025: Sacred Plant Alliance ($157k), Chacruna Institute for Psychedelic Plant ($19k).
Does Chacruna Institute for Psychedelic Plant fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 33% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is Chacruna Institute for Psychedelic Plant based?
Chacruna Institute for Psychedelic Plant is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 4 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Chacruna Institute for Psychedelic Plant’s filings →

More from the funding graph