Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

New York · Public charity

Center for Social Inclusion

To catalyze communities, government, and other institutions to dismantle structural racial inequity and create equitable outcomes for all.

$645k
Granted FY2017
1
Grants FY2017
1
Organizations funded FY2017
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2017
$644,500
Largest grant, FY2017
$644,500
States reached, FY2017
1

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2017, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Race Forward$644,50014%

Compare Center for Social Inclusion with peer funders

About Center for Social Inclusion

How much does Center for Social Inclusion give?
Center for Social Inclusion reported 1 grants totaling $644,500 in its FY2017 IRS filing.
What does Center for Social Inclusion fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2017, its largest causes are Civil Rights (100%).
Who are Center for Social Inclusion's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2017: Race Forward ($645k).
Where is Center for Social Inclusion based?
Center for Social Inclusion is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2022) is on record and reports $93k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2017, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home