Skip to content

Michigan · Public charity

Center for Land Reform Inc Dba Center for Community Progress

To foster strong, equitable communities where vacant, abandoned, and deteriorated properties are transformed into assets for neighbors and neighborhoods.

$1.5M
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
12
Grants FY2025
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$86,250
Largest grant, FY2025
$238,251
States reached, FY2025
11
Total assets, FY2025
$6.8M

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2025 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 12 grantees
All grantees of Center for Land Reform Inc Dba Center for Community Progress by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Legal Aid of North Carolina Inc$238,2511n/a
Wake Forest University$223,55310%
Southeast Louisiana Legal Services Corp$209,9921n/a
Housing Assistance Council$200,00012%
Asset Funders Network$150,00013%
Maryland Volunteer Lawyers Service Inc$86,25012%
Legal Services of Greater Miami Inc$86,2501n/a
Legal Services of Eastern Missouri Inc$86,1751n/a
Center for Heirs' Property Preservation$85,0001n/a
Affordable Housing Centers of Pennsylvania$75,00012%
Middle Georgia Access to Justice Council Inc$56,25019%
Centro de Apoyo Familiar$45,0001n/a

Compare Center for Land Reform Inc Dba Center for Community Progress with peer funders

About Center for Land Reform Inc Dba Center for Community Progress

How much does Center for Land Reform Inc Dba Center for Community Progress give?
Center for Land Reform Inc Dba Center for Community Progress reported 12 grants totaling $1,541,721 in its FY2025 IRS filing.
Who are Center for Land Reform Inc Dba Center for Community Progress's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2025 to FY2025: Legal Aid of North Carolina Inc ($238k), Wake Forest University ($224k), Southeast Louisiana Legal Services Corp ($210k).
Where is Center for Land Reform Inc Dba Center for Community Progress based?
Center for Land Reform Inc Dba Center for Community Progress is based in MI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Center for Land Reform Inc Dba Center for Community Progress’ filings →

More from the funding graph