· Public charity
Center for Heirs' Property Preservation
(See Schedule O)
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $324k
- $250k+2 grants · $561k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Livelihoods Knowledge Exchange Network Inc | $304,864 |
| Legal Services Alabama Inc | $256,248 |
| Mississippi Center for Justice | $98,387 |
| University of Arkansas Pine Bluff | $84,075 |
| Mississippi Association of Cooperatives | $76,146 |
| The Economic Opportunity Center Inc | $65,000 |
| LR Lean Inc | $22,480 |
| Winston County Self Help Cooperative | $14,070 |
| Coastal Carolina University | $13,000 |
| Winyah Rivers Alliance | $6,181 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $424k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LSLEGAL SERVICES ALABAMA INC2× · 2023–2024 · $336k · revenue +12%
- MAMississippi Association of Cooperatives Inc3× · 2022–2024 · $126k · revenue +44%
- EOECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CENTER2× · 2020–2024 · $90k · revenue +74%
Funded once
- NANATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INCone grant, 2023 · $8k
NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue +32%
AMERICAN RIVERS INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue +187%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Coordinate rc&d activity in alabama
Promotion of sustainable development in the united states.
The restoration of natural systems in the mattole valley watershed and their maintenance at sustainable levels of health and productivity, especially in regards to forests, fisheries, soils, and other native plant and animal communities.
America's watershed initiative serves as a trusted voice that brings partners together and champions sound science to secure a future in which the rivers and people of the mississippi river watershed thrive.
The mission of the montana land reliance (mlr) is to partner with landowners to provide permanent protection for private lands that are significant for agricultural production, fish and wildlife habitat, and open space.
Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…
Alabama Rivers Alliance is a statewide network of groups working to protect and restore all of Alabama's water resources through building partnerships, empowering citizens, and advocating for sound water policy and its enforcement.
To conserve, promote, and protect the open spaces and green places of ecological cultural or scenic significance in the counties of the mississippi coastal plain.
Agriculture resource conservation. To provide conservation, protection, development, and utilization fo natural and human resources. To enhance the economic and social well-being of people and provide enrichment and
Conservation, development, and proper use of the natural resources within the development area of autauga, bullock, butler, elmore, lee, lowndes, macon and montgomery counties.
To cultivate strong communities rooted in social and economic justice, environmental stewardship, and opportunity for all.
Wwt's mission is to protect and restore water in rivers and streams across washington state. washington water trust restores and protects water in rivers and streams and promotes sustainable freshwater management in washington, and, more…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mississippi Center for Justice and the most unlike its peers is National Audubon Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MISSISSIPPI CENTER FOR JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds LEGAL SERVICES ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds LIVELIHOODS KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds Mississippi Association of Cooperatives Inc ↗
- Who funds ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds WINSTON COUNTY SELF HELP COOPERATIVE ↗
- Who funds LRLEAN INC ↗
- Who funds Winyah Rivers Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN RIVERS INC ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Center for Heirs' Property Preservation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Center for Heirs' Property Preservation?
Find your warmest path to Center for Heirs' Property Preservation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.