· Public charity
Center for Community Recovery Innovations Inc
Ccri awards grants that support the creation or preservation of affordable sober housing in massachusetts.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $19k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $294k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $678k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HIGH POINTSEMCOA (NEW BEDFORD) | $200,000 |
| MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION SPRINGFIELD | $141,164 |
| STEPPINGSTONE INC | $137,000 |
| GAAMHA INC | $100,000 |
| NEIGHBORHOOD WORKS SOUTHERN MA | $100,000 |
| POWER FORWARD INC | $44,778 |
| LAZARUS HOUSE INC | $36,563 |
| HOUSING SUPPORTS NEWBURYPORT | $33,672 |
| SELF ESTEEM BOSTON EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE INC | $33,062 |
| GILLY'S HOUSE | $28,562 |
| GANDARA CENTER | $26,281 |
| NAMASTAY SOBER INC | $26,150 |
| 555 MERRIMACK STREET LLC (AKA COALITION FOR A BETTER ACRE) | $25,000 |
| CASA ESPERANZA INC | $14,974 |
| SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE | $13,452 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $306k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MHMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION INC5× · 2020–2025 · $359k · revenue +148%
- NHNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF THE SOUTH SHORE INC4× · 2020–2025 · $325k · revenue +197%
- GIGAAMHA INC4× · 2020–2025 · $275k · revenue +152%
Funded once
- FBFATHER BILL'S & MAINSPRING INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $175k · revenue +107%
- SHSAGE HOUSING INCone grant, 2020 · $125k · revenue -46% · 67% of their budget
- OHOPENING HEAVENS DOOR MINISTRIES INCone grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue -54% · 71% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Assisting and housing females in recovery
To provide residential-based drug and alcohol rehabilitation support services in the greater boston massachusetts area.
Gavin foundation provides substance abuse education, counseling, housing and support services for individuals located in the south boston area of massachusetts and surrounding communities.
To promote long term sobriety for men who seek help in their addiction.
Transition house is a human services agency dedicated to preventing and ending domestic violence. the agency provides a continuum of housing resources and holistic support for survivors of violence and their children, as well as prevention…
The mission of the boston health care for the homeless program (bhchp) is to provide or assure access to the highest quality health care for all individuals and families experiencing homelessness in our community.
Alcohol drug rehab and halfway house.
Transitional and permanent supportive housing - provides shelter in the greater Manchester NH area. Services include housing, counseling (including substance abuse counseling), job search assistance, etc.
Residential treatment centers that offer programs to enable individuals to make the necessary changes to recover from substance abuse and lead productive lives.
Bay cove human services' mission is to partner with people to overcome challenges and realize personal potential. bay cove pursues this mission by providing individualized and compassionate services to people facing the challenges…
The mission of this organization is to be acknowledged by our communitities as an organization providing structured and safe residential sober living programs to those struggling with addiction that is based on integrity, compassion and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint Francis House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Jewish Home for Aged Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF THE SOUTH SHORE INC ↗
- Who funds GAAMHA INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH HOME FOR AGED FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HIGH POINT TREATMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Housing Support Inc ↗
- Who funds FATHER BILL'S & MAINSPRING INC ↗
- Who funds STEPPINGSTONE INC ↗
- Who funds JOHN ASHFORD LINK HOUSE ↗
- Who funds Self Esteem Boston Educational Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds BROOKVIEW HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds SAGE HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH STAR FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds LOWELL HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR A BETTER ACRE INC ↗
- Who funds OPENING HEAVENS DOOR MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds JEREMIAH'S INN INC ↗
- Who funds St Mary's Center for Women & Children Inc ↗
- Who funds VICTORY PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds EMH Recovery Inc ↗
- Who funds ROXBURY STONE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds ALLSTON BRIGHTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ACT LAWRENCE INC ↗
- Who funds Providence Ministries for the Needy Inc ↗
- Who funds POWER FORWARD INC ↗
- Who funds Gillys House Inc ↗
- Who funds VETERANS INC ↗
- Who funds CASA ESPERANZA INC ↗
- Who funds GANDARA MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LAZARUS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds WORCESTER COMMON GROUND INC ↗
- Who funds SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds ADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE NEW ENGLAND AND NEW JERSEY INC ↗
- Who funds NAMASTAY SOBER INC ↗
- Who funds OAK HILL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATI ↗
- Who funds BRIDGEWELL INC ↗
- Who funds ABBY KELLEY FOSTER HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds THE MEGAN HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Health Resources in Action Inc · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Rize Massachusetts Foundation Inc · Amelia Peabody Charitable Fund Trust · Berkshire Bank Foundation Inc · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · Arbella Insurance Foundation · The Harborone Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Center for Community Recovery Innovations Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Bridgewell Inc — 85% of income from government
- Mental Health Association Inc — 66% of income from government
- Casa Esperanza Inc — 59% of income from government
- Veterans Inc — 58% of income from government
- Gaamha Inc — 58% of income from government
- Gandara Mental Health Center Inc — 55% of income from government
- Victory Programs Inc — 49% of income from government
- Act Lawrence Inc — 44% of income from government
- St Mary's Center for Women & Children Inc — 40% of income from government
- Brookview House Inc — 34% of income from government
- Steppingstone Inc — 33% of income from government
- Roxbury Stone House Inc — 29% of income from government
- John Ashford Link House — 25% of income from government
- Father Bill's & Mainspring Inc — 24% of income from government
- High Point Treatment Center Inc — 20% of income from government
- Rural Development Inc — 18% of income from government
- Saint Francis House Inc — 18% of income from government
- The Megan House Foundation Inc — 15% of income from government
- Emh Recovery Inc — 14% of income from government
- Hope House Inc — 13% of income from government
- North Star Family Services Inc — 12% of income from government
- Jeremiah's Inn Inc — 2% of income from government
- Worcester Common Ground Inc — 1% of income from government
- Lazarus House Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.