Skip to content
Celina-Mercer County Combined Services Appeal Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Celina-Mercer County Combined Services Appeal Inc

Assist in collecting/disbursing funds to charities.

$122k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$297kHuman Services$79kPublic Safety & Disaster$16kArts & Culture$7kYouth Development$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $104,009, the rows itemized in this filing. The $122,479 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $18,470 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $65k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $39k
$8,941
Median grant
1
States reached
$115k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTER FOR NEUROLOGICAL DEVEL$15,208
CANCER ASSOC OF MERCER CO$13,339
CHOOSING LIFE PREGNANCY CENTER$10,151
FOUNDATIONS BEHAVIORAL SERVICES$9,809
OUR HOME INC$9,455
EVERHEART HOSPICE OF DARKE CO$8,941
Individual grant recipient$7,659
HOSPICE THE CARING WAY - CHPINC$6,531
AMERICAN RED CROSS$6,296
CELINA ADULT DAY CARE - PRIVATE$5,710
YMCA$5,512
ARC OF OHIO IN MERCER CO$5,398
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $87k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%OUR HOME INC: $17k → 8%CHOOSING LIFE PREGNANCY CENTER: $14k → 8%CHOOSING LIFE PREGNANCY CENTER: $10k → 8%OUR HOME INC: $9k → 8%CHOOSING LIFE PREGNANCY CENTER: $9k → 8%CHOOSING LIFE PREGNANCY CENTER: $8k → 8%OUR HOME INC: $8k → 8%CHOOSING LIFE PREGNANCY CENTER: $7k → 8%MERCER RESIDENTIAL SERVICES: $6k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$407k · 13 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
5

Total granted

$407k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+20%

Still filing today

15%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CENTER FOR NEUROLOGICAL DEVEL
    5× · 2020–2024 · $67k
  • CA
    CANCER ASSOC OF MERCER CO
    5× · 2020–2024 · $61k
  • CL
    CHOOSING LIFE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER
    5× · 2020–2024 · $47k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • HO
    HOSPICE OF DARKE CO
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • MC
    MERCER CO HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2021 · $7k
  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA BLACK SWAMP
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
3/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTER FOR NEUROLOGICAL DEVEL: $67,184 · OtherCENTER FOR NEUROLOGICAL DEVELCANCER ASSOC OF MERCER CO: $60,745 · OtherCANCER ASSOC OF MERCER COFOUNDATIONS BEHAVIORAL SERVICES: $38,809 · OtherFOUNDATIONS BEHAVIORAL SERVICESEVERHEART HOSPICE OF DARKE CO: $36,275 · OtherEVERHEART HOSPICE OF DARKE COHOSPICE THE CARING WAY - CHPINC: $31,722 · OtherHOSPICE THE CARING WAY - CHPINCIndividual grant recipient: $23,259 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMERICAN RED CROSS: $16,296 · OtherARC OF OHIO IN MERCER CO: $14,173 · OtherCELINA ADULT DAY CARE - PRIVATE: $13,210 · OtherGIFTS UNDER 5000 EACH: $13,031 · Other+5 more: $39,933 · Other+5 moreCHOOSING LIFE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $47,140 · Human ServicesCHOOSING LIFE PREGNANC…OUR HOME INC: $34,130 · Human ServicesOUR HOME INCMERCER RESIDENTIAL SERVICES INC: $5,850 · Human ServicesMERCER RESIDENTIAL SER…
Other$354,637Human Services$87,120

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHOOSING LIFE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $47,140 over 5y, 7.8% of budgetOUR HOME INC: $34,130 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetMERCER RESIDENTIAL SERVICES INC: $5,850 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHOOSING LIFE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OUR HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds MERCER RESIDENTIAL SERVICES INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Celina-Mercer County Combined Services Appeal Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Celina-Mercer County Combined Services Appeal Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Celina-Mercer County Combined Services Appeal Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Celina-Mercer County Combined Services Appeal Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Celina-Mercer County Combined Services Appeal’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home