Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cecilia Young Willard Helping Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$284k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$57k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$608kEducation$501kHealth$402kReligion$377kEnvironment$116k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $177k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $107k
$34,091
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF HICKORY$56,818
NCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS INC$50,000
CROSSNORE SCHOOL INC$34,091
LEES-MCRAE COLLEGE INC$34,091
GRANDFATHER HOME FOR CHILDREN$34,091
GUADALUPE CENTER INC$30,000
YOUTH HAVEN INC$15,000
THE SALVATION ARMY NAPLES$10,000
NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC$10,000
NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $496k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%GRANDFATHER HOME FOR CHILDREN: $39k → 21%GRANDFATHER HOME FOR CHILDREN: $36k → 21%PICKERSGILL INC: $5k → 11%GRANDFATHER HOME FOR CHILDREN: $34k → 21%PICKERSGILL INC: $5k → 11%GRANDFATHER HOME FOR CHILDREN: $34k → 21%HOUSE OF RUTH MARYLAND INC: $5k → 19%HOUSE OF RUTH MARYLAND INC: $5k → 19%HOUSE OF RUTH MARYLAND INC: $3k → 19%GUADALUPE CENTER INC: $30k → 10%GRANDFATHER HOME FOR CHILDREN: $32k → 21%GAUDALUPE CENTER INC: $30k → 10%GRANDFATHER HOME FOR CHILDREN: $30k → 21%GAUDALUPE CENTER INC: $30k → 10%GAUDALUPE CENTER INC: $30k → 10%GRANDFATHER HOME FOR CHILDREN: $18k → 21%GAUDALUPE CENTER INC: $28k → 10%GAUDALUPE CENTER INC: $20k → 10%YOUTH HAVEN INC: $21k → 10%GRANDFATHER HOME FOR CHILDREN: $16k → 21%YOUTH HAVEN INC: $15k → 10%YOUTH HAVEN INC: $15k → 10%YOUTH HAVEN INC: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 17 repeat orgs$103k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
2

Total granted

$1.9M
$36k

Still filing today

65%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $67k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEnvironmentHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LEES-MCRAE COLLEGE INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $240k · revenue +68%
  • GC
    Guadalupe Center Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $168k · revenue +27%
  • NCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $160k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • JH
    JOHN HOPKINS HOSPITAL - KIMMEL CANCER
    one grant, 2023 · $18k
  • JH
    JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY - PEABODY INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2022 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation

Johns hopkins health system corporation provides centralized management of a multi-hospital healthcare system. it is a key component of johns hopkins medicine, a collaboration with the johns hopkins university school of medicine.

Health
2
Miami Jewish Health Systems Inc

Miami jewish health systems, inc. was incorporated to provide shelter for the elderly and develop social & health programs relating to their care. in addition, research & educational programs are conducted for the elderly to enhance their…

Human Services
3
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
4
The Green Home

Skilled nursing facility.

—
5
Wrc Pennsylvania Memorial Home

Wrc pennsylvania memorial home's mission is to provide choices for generations. built on a not-for-profit foundation of caring, the organization offers residential and personal care, home and community-based services, skilled and…

Health
6
Nuvance Health Medical Practice Pc

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

Health
7
Joseph Richey House Inc

The joseph richey house inc. provided hospice home care and palliative care for terminally ill adults and children. the joseph richey house was closed in december 2021. services are now provided by gilchrist center baltimore.

—
8
Naples Community Hospital Inc

Helping everyone live a longer, happier, and healthier life.

Health
9
Glacier Hills Inc

We, trinity senior living communities and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence in our communities.glacier hills is a member of the trinity senior living communities…

Human Services
10
Pediatric Specialty Group Inc

Pediatric specialty group, inc. (d/b/a nicklaus children's pediatric specialists ("ncps")) is a physician-directed, multi-specialty pediatric group with a regional, national, and international presence in providing pediatric-centric care…

—
11
East Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc

East tennessee children's hospital is a free-standing, independent, not-for-profit pediatric health care system which serves the east tennessee region. children's hospital is certified by the state of tennessee as a comprehensive regional…

Health
12
Heritage House Nursing Center Inc

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. heritage house nursing center is a member of st. peter's health…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nch Healthcare System Inc; the most unlike its peers is Guadalupe Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $320,580 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHCROSSNORE SCHOOL INC: $188,290 · OtherCROSSNORE SCHOOL INCTHE SALVATION ARMY: $102,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYCROSSNORE SCHOOL FOR CHILDREN: $72,921 · OtherCROSSNORE SCHOOL FOR CHILDRENFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF HICKORY: $56,818 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF HICKORYJOHN HOPKINS KIMMEL CANCER CENTER: $42,900 · OtherJOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $40,000 · Other+4 more: $69,000 · Other+4 moreGRANDFATHER HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $239,763 · Human ServicesGRANDFATHER HOME FOR CHILDRE…Guadalupe Center Inc: $168,000 · Human ServicesGuadalupe Center IncYOUTH HAVEN INC: $65,500 · Human ServicesYOUTH HAVEN INC+2 more: $23,000 · Human ServicesNCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC: $160,000 · HealthNCH HEALTHCARE…NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC: $100,000 · HealthNEIGHBORHOOD H…LEES-MCRAE COLLEGE INC: $239,763 · EducationLEES-MCRAE CO…IRVINE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER INC: $60,000 · EnvironmentNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $55,500 · Environment
Other$892,509Human Services$496,263Health$260,000Education$239,763Environment$115,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGRANDFATHER HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $239,763 over 8y, 3.9% of budgetLEES-MCRAE COLLEGE INC: $239,763 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetGuadalupe Center Inc: $168,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetNCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC: $160,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC: $100,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetYOUTH HAVEN INC: $65,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetIRVINE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER INC: $60,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $55,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGILCHRIST HOSPICE CARE INC: $23,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOUSE OF RUTH MARYLAND INC: $13,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPICKERSGILL INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GRANDFATHER HOME FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds LEES-MCRAE COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Guadalupe Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds NCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds IRVINE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds GILCHRIST HOSPICE CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOUSE OF RUTH MARYLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds PICKERSGILL INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cecilia Young Willard Helping Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cecilia Young Willard Helping Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The House of Ruth Maryland Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Gilchrist Hospice Care Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Youth Haven Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Guadalupe Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cecilia Young Willard Helping’s filings →

More from the funding graph