· Private foundation
CCG Foundation a NJ Nonprofit Corporation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k69 grants · $69k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $88k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| The Donors Fund | $36,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $32,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| Yeshiva Chemdas Hatorah | $9,850 |
| Congregation Pri Aharon | $8,000 |
| FRIENDS OF DUSHINSKY INC | $5,000 |
| Ateres Tzvi | $5,000 |
| Belev Echad | $5,000 |
| Yeshiva Nesiv Hatalmud | $3,750 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,154 |
| Jewish Niagara | $2,042 |
| Congregation Darkei Avos Sanz | $1,800 |
| Zichron Menachem | $1,800 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +80% since the first grant, against +56% for those funded once.
72 repeat relationships: 41 still active in FY2024, 31 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- KHKEREN HATZEDAKA INC3× · 2022–2024 · $3k · revenue +6%
- ATA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange3× · 2020–2023 · $792 · revenue +125%
- SFSERVICES FOR CHILDREN WITH HIDDEN INTELLIGENCE3× · 2020–2023 · $644 · revenue +80%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $50k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $31k
- ZZSYFone grant, 2018 · $13k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide financial assistance to torah and talmudic scholars, as well as to other needy individuals and other organizations that work to promote these purposes.
The purpose of this organization is to support indigent torah scholars and their families by providing stipends and additional funds at jewish holiday times.
The furthurance of jewish concepts and religious beliefs.
Provide financial assistance to needy individuals, and to religious, educational, and charitable organizations in us and abroad.
Religious Teaching
To award financial grants to religios orthodox jewish organizations and to help by financial means, the needy, sick and disabled people.
Provides finacial assistance to needy individuals and to religious, charitable organizations
How this is measured
31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 208 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · The Sorala Foundation · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · Donors Fund Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Eisenberg Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Jacob and Malka Fischer Foundation · Regina Goldwasser Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Lcpv Foundation Inc · Jsp Family Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization CCG Foundation a NJ Nonprofit Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from CCG Foundation a NJ Nonprofit Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Mesivta Keren Orah: 10% of income from government
- Bais Tova Inc: 7% of income from government
- The Special Children Center: 5% of income from government
- Chai 4EVER Inc: 2% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on CCG Foundation a NJ Nonprofit’s filings →