Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

New York · Public charity

Catholics for Choice

Catholics for Choice - which serves the pro-choice Catholic majority - encounters, educates, and emboldens people of faith who support reproductive freedom. Catholics for Choice believes healthcare is a human right and that includes access to abortion. Our faith calls us to affirm reproductive and religious freedom as essential to…

$163k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
2
Itemized grants FY2024
2
Organizations funded FY2022
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$138k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$100,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$100,000
States reached, FY2024
2
Total assets, FY2024
$13M
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Religion$100kCivil Rights$40kCommunity Improvement$38kHealth$20k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2022 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Wijngaards Institute for Catholic Research$100,0001n/a
Faith Choice Ohio$40,00019%
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated$38,00011%
Faith Roots Reproductive Action$20,00015%

Compare Catholics for Choice with peer funders

About Catholics for Choice

How much does Catholics for Choice give?
Catholics for Choice reported 2 itemized grants totaling $138,000, out of $162,718 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does Catholics for Choice fund?
By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2024, its largest causes are Religion (51%), Civil Rights (20%), Community Improvement (19%).
Who are Catholics for Choice's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2022 to FY2024: Wijngaards Institute for Catholic Research ($100k), Faith Choice Ohio ($40k), National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated ($38k).
Where is Catholics for Choice based?
Catholics for Choice is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 4 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Catholics for Choice’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home