Skip to content

· Public charity

Catholic Financial Life Foundation Inc

The Foundation, rooted in the Catholic and fraternal values of stewardship, service, and concern for others, seeks to strengthen individuals, our church, and society by: Providing resources to advance the mission of Catholic parishes and organizations, supporting charitable outreach, educating individuals about philanthropy and planned…

$487k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$109k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.0MHuman Services$320kInternational$250kHousing & Shelter$88kEmployment$56kReligion$36kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kRecreation & Sports$7k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $465,210, the rows itemized in this filing. The $487,204 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $21,994 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $342k
$37,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Archdiocese of Milwaukee$109,333
Catholic Relief Services$80,334
United Community Center$52,000
Partners 4 Hope Tanzania$50,000
Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Milwaukee$50,000
Milwaukee Habitat for Humanity$37,500
St Joan Antida High School$25,000
Marquette University College of Business$25,000
St Francis De Sales Seminary$17,424
New Threads Of Hope Inc$10,000
Holy Angels Parish$8,619
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $393k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%Partners 4 Hope Tanzania: $50k → 6%Partners 4 Hope Tanzania: $50k → 6%Partners 4 Hope Tanzania: $50k → 6%PARTNERS 4 HOPE TANZANIA: $35k → 6%Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Milwaukee: $50k → 17%Marquette University College of Business: $25k → 17%United Community Center: $56k → 17%Marquette University College of Business: $25k → 17%United Community Center: $52k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Catholic Financial Life Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Catholic Financial Life Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 11% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 12 repeat orgs$342k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
8

Total granted

$1.5M
$282k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+46%

Still filing today

42%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • P4
    Partners 4 Hope Tanzania
    4× · 2021–2024 · $185k · revenue +98% · 37% of their budget
  • UC
    UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $108k · revenue +1%
  • MILWAUKEE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $88k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • TF
    TRUSTED FRATERNAL LIFE
    one grant, 2020 · $108k · revenue +15%
  • CR
    CRISTO REY JESUIT CORPORATE WORK STUDY PROGRAM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $56k · revenue +79%
  • DH
    DOMINICAN HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $28k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Milwaukee Catholic Home Inc

Rooted in our catholic tradition and commitment to christian love and community, milwaukee catholic home, inc. (mch) provides continuing care services for older adults.

Human Services
2
Mercy Home Care

The Mission of Mercy Home Care, as part of the Catholic Health System (CHS) in Western New York, is to provide quality healthcare services in a home care setting. Committed to a common mission, the providers of Mercy Home Care continue the…

Human Services
3
Franciscan Villa of South Milwaukee

As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

—
4
Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago

Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago's purpose is to partner with mission-driven people and organizations across Cook and Lake counties and to witness a message of mercy and hope to a world in need through service.

—
5
Mother Teresa Shelter Inc

To provide comprehensive, community-based outreach services to homeless individuals and families, by creating opportunities that will help break the cycle of homelessness.

—
6
Catholic Residential Services Inc Dba Benedictine Living Communities of Wi

We are a catholic, faith-based organization entrusted with advancing the life-enhancing senior care ministry of the benedictine sisters of duluth, minnesota. we witness to god's love by creating inclusive communities, supporting those we…

Human Services
7
Catholic Medical Center

The heart of Catholic Medical Center is to carry out Christ's healing ministry by offering health, healing, and hope to every individual who seeks our care.

Health
8
Trinity Hospital Twin City

As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

—
9
Catholic Charities of Central and Northern Missouri

Inspired by the gospel of the beatitudes as proclaimed by Jesus Christ, Catholic Charities of Central and Northern Missouri is committed to providing care and creating hope for the lives of the vulnerable through compassionate social…

Human Services
10
Catholic Charities Terre Haute Inc

Catholic Charities Terre Haute is a comprehensive, direct services agency whose purpose is to serve the poor, the homeless, the elderly, the neglected children and the needy.

—
11
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of St Cloud

At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…

Human Services
12
Christus Health

Supporting the health care ministries of the sponsoring congregations in extending the healing ministry of jesus christ in conformity with the roman catholic church.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Milwaukee Inc; the most unlike its peers is Father Pablos Mission Helpers of the Holy Savior. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CURSILLO IN CHRISTIANITY OF THE ARC HDIOCESE OF MILWAUKEE: $285,999 · OtherCURSILLO IN CHRISTIANITY OF THE ARC HDIOCESE OF MILWAUKEESETON CATHOLIC SCHOOLS: $200,376 · OtherSETON CATHOLIC SCHOOLSCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $190,334 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESSAINT FRANCIS DE SALES SEMINARY: $121,698 · OtherSAINT FRANCIS DE SALES SEMINARYTRUSTED FRATERNAL LIFE: $108,484 · OtherTRUSTED FRATERNAL LIFEMESSMER INC: $75,000 · OtherMESSMER INCCONGREGATION OF HOLY ANGELS: $74,907 · OtherCONGREGATION OF HOLY ANGELSST JOAN ANTIDA HIGH SCHOOL INC: $61,000 · OtherCRISTO REY JESUIT CORPORATE WORK STUDY PROGRAM INC: $56,400 · Other+5 more: $107,340 · Other+5 morePartners 4 Hope Tanzania: $185,000 · Human ServicesPartners 4 Hope TanzaniaUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $107,500 · Human ServicesUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER I…CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF MILWAUKEE INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE…THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE CHIPPEWA VALLEY: $50,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN …+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesMILWAUKEE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $87,500 · Housing & ShelterFather Pablos Mission Helpers of the Holy Savior: $10,779 · ReligionNEWTHREADS OF HOPE INC: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,281,538Human Services$402,500Housing & Shelter$87,500Religion$10,779Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPartners 4 Hope Tanzania: $185,000 over 4y, 37% of budgetTRUSTED FRATERNAL LIFE: $108,484 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $107,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $87,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCRISTO REY JESUIT CORPORATE WORK STUDY PROGRAM INC: $56,400 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF MILWAUKEE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE CHIPPEWA VALLEY: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFather Pablos Mission Helpers of the Holy Savior: $10,779 over 2y, 10% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEWTHREADS OF HOPE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Partners 4 Hope Tanzania ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTED FRATERNAL LIFE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds CRISTO REY JESUIT CORPORATE WORK STUDY PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF MILWAUKEE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE CHIPPEWA VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds Father Pablos Mission Helpers of the Holy Savior ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds NEWTHREADS OF HOPE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Archdiocese of Milwaukee Catholic Community Foundation IncWI24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Archdiocese of Milwaukee Catholic Community Foundation Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Trusted Fraternal Life · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Merkel Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · The Sartori Family Foundation Inc · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Catholic Financial Life Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Catholic Financial Life Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Catholic Financial Life Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Catholic Financial Life Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Catholic Financial Life’s filings →

    More from the funding graph