Skip to content

· Private foundation

Carson Barbara Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$10kEducation$9kReligion$4kHealth$3kFood & Nutrition$2k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$85k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ART SCHOOL INC$1,000
LITERACY SERVICES OF WISCONSIN INC$1,000
UWM FOUNDATION INC$1,000
COMMUNITY PROJECTS COMMITTEE INC$500
CHURCH OF OUR LADY OF SORROWS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 70% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ART SCHOOL INC: $2k → 11%LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETY INC: $750 → 9%THE CHURCH OF OUR LADY OF SORROWS: $500 → 13%UWM FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 17%CHURCH OF OUR LADY OF SORROWS: $500 → 16%ART SCHOOL INC: $1k → 11%LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY INC: $750 → 9%THE CHURCH OF OUR LADY OF SORROWS: $500 → 13%MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $500 → 17%ART SCHOOL INC: $1k → 11%LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY INC: $250 → 9%THE CHURCH OF OUR LADY OF SORROWS: $500 → 13%ART SCHOOL INC: $1k → 17%ART SCHOOL INC: $1k → 11%LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY INC: $250 → 9%THE CHURCH OF OUR LADY OF SORROWS: $500 → 13%ART SCHOOL INC: $1k → 17%ART SCHOOL INC: $1k → 11%LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETY INC: $250 → 9%THE CHURCH OF OUR LADY OF SORROWS: $500 → 13%ART SCHOOL INC: $1k → 17%LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY INC: $250 → 9%THE CHURCH OF OUR LADY OF SORROWS: $500 → 13%COMMUNITY PROJECTS COMMITTEE INC: $500 → 17%THE CHURCH OF OUR LADY OF SORROWS: $500 → 13%COMMUNITY PROJECTS COMMITTEE INC: $500 → 17%COMMUNITY PROJECTS COMMITTEE INC: $500 → 17%STEM FORWARD INC: $500 → 17%STEM FORWARD INC: $500 → 17%STEM FORWARD INC: $500 → 17%LITERACY SERVICES OF WISCONSIN INC: $1k → 17%LITERACY SERVICES OF WISCONSIN INC: $750 → 17%LITERACY SERVICES OF WISCONSIN INC: $750 → 17%LITERACY SERVICES OF WISCONSIN INC: $750 → 17%LITERACY SERVICES OF WISCONSIN INC: $750 → 17%LITERACY SERVICES OF WISCONSIN INC: $750 → 17%LITERACY SERVICES OF WISCONSIN INC: $750 → 17%LITERACY SERVICES OF WISCONSIN INC: $750 → 17%UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$25k · 7 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

$25k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+8%

Still filing today

71%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LITERACY SERVICES OF WISCONSIN INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $6k · revenue +92%
  • CP
    COMMUNITY PROJECTS COMMITTEE INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $2k · revenue +36%
  • STEM FORWARD INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $2k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • MA
    MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC
    one grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue +8%
  • UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC
    one grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue -25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uwm Research Foundation Inc

Support research and innovation at the university of wisconsin - milwaukee by providing reserach funding, entrepreneurship support, and by engaging in corporate partnering activities to that end.

Community Improvement
2
Wisconsin Academy of Sciences Arts and Letters

To cultivate civil discourse, increase understanding, and create common ground by connecting wisconsin people and ideas.

Arts & Culture
3
Museum of Wisconsin Art Inc

The museum of wisconsin art celebrates the value, diversity, and uniqueness of the visual arts and artists of wisconsin. this is achieved by collecting, conserving, documenting, exhibiting, and promoting aesthetic understanding of the…

Arts & Culture
4
Artworks for Milwaukee Inc

ArtWorks mission is preparing youth for tomorrow by providing transferable career skills through arts internships today. More than 1,450 high school students have completed ArtWorks internships since our inception.

Arts & Culture
5
University Research Park Incorporated

The organization acquires, holds, administers, and distributes real and personal property for the benefit of the university of wisconsin (uw)-madison.

Education
6
The Uwm Real Estate Foundation Inc

To partner with the public and private sectors to develop and hold real estate for the benefit of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee. the uwm real estate foundation, inc. holdings may include any properties that advance the mission of…

Housing & Shelter
7
University of Wisconsin Foundation

To promote the welfare of and advance the objectives of the university of wisconsin-madison by encouraging the interest, engagement, and financial support of alumni, donors, and friends in the life of the university and with each other.

Education
8
The University School of Milwaukee Corporation

University school of milwaukee cultivates excellence in learning, leadership, and citizenship for prekindergarten through 12th grade students. students are engaged, known, and valued within our passionate independent school community…

Education
9
Milwaukee Public Theatre Inc

Making the arts accessible to all

—
10
Arts At Large Inc

The mission of Arts @ Large is to activate Milwaukees communities to build environments that support arts-rich, lifelong learning. The organization uses the arts to cultivate inclusive and innovative communities where students, their…

Arts & Culture
11
Wicell Research Institute Inc

Wicell's primary purpose is to support research of stem cell technologies at the university of wisconsin-madison and development of stem cell applications worldwide.the scientific research carried out by wicell and others who acquire cells…

Health
12
Arts for All Wisconsin Inc

To expand the capabilities, confidence, and quality of life for children and adults with disabilities by providing programs in dance, drama, creative writing, music, and visual art.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Milwaukee Art Museum Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ART SCHOOL INC: $5,500 · OtherART SCHOOL INCTHE CHURCH OF OUR LADY OF SORROWS: $4,000 · OtherTHE CHURCH OF OUR LADY OF SORROWSSTEM FORWARD INC: $1,500 · OtherSTEM FORWARD INCLITERACY SERVICES OF WISCONSIN INC: $6,250 · EducationLITERACY SERVICES OF WISCONSIN …THE UWM FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · EducationTHE UWM FOUNDATION INCThe Art School Inc: $3,000 · Arts & CultureThe Art School In…MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $500 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE ART MUS…UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC: $500 · Arts & CultureUNITED PERFORMING…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,750 · HealthBLOOD CANCE…COMMUNITY PROJECTS COMMITTEE INC: $1,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$11,000Education$7,250Arts & Culture$4,000Health$2,750Food & Nutrition$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLITERACY SERVICES OF WISCONSIN INC: $6,250 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetThe Art School Inc: $3,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY PROJECTS COMMITTEE INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSTEM FORWARD INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE UWM FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LITERACY SERVICES OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds The Art School Inc ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PROJECTS COMMITTEE INC ↗
  • Who funds STEM FORWARD INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UWM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carson Barbara Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carson Barbara Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Carson Barbara Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph