Skip to content

· Public charity

Carolinas District Kiwanis Foundation Inc

To offer financial assistance to the district, divisions, and to clubs to build, aid, foster, and promote the principals, and objectives of kiwanis throughout the carolinas district with an emphasis on financial assistance to our sponsored youth organizations - particularly builders clubs, key clubs, and circle k clubs.

$152k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Human Services$30kYouth Development$27kCommunity Improvement$12kPhilanthropy$7k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $139,582, the rows itemized in this filing. The $151,577 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $11,995 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $124k
$11,783
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAROLINAS DISTRICT OF KEY CLUB$18,000
KIWANIS INTERNATIONAL INC$11,783
KIWANIS INTERNATIONAL INC$11,783
THE KIWANIS CLUB OF BLACK MOUNTAIN SWANNANOA FOUNDATION INC$11,783
RUTHERFORD KIWANIS FOUNDATION INC$11,783
KIWANIS CLUB OF ASHEVILLE$11,783
KIWANIS CLUB OF BANNER ELK FOUNDATION$11,783
THE BOONE KIWANIS FOUNDATION INC$11,783
THE KIWANIS CLUB OF TRYON FOUNDATION INC$11,783
KIWANIS CLUB OF WAYNESVILLE CHARITABLE CORPORATION$11,783
CAROLINAS DISTRICT OF CIRCLE K INTERNATIONAL$8,660
BOYS AND GIRLS HOMES OF NC$6,875
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BOYS AND GIRLS HOME AT LAKE WACCAMAW: $30k → 21%BOYS AND GIRLS HOMES OF NC: $7k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$121k · 4 repeat orgs$94k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +315% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
8

Total granted

$121k
$94k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+315%
0%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $94k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KC
    KEY CLUB INTERNATIONAL DBA CAROLINA'S DISTRICT OF KEY CLUB
    3× · 2022–2025 · $45k · revenue +315%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS HOMES OF NC INC
    2× · 2018–2025 · $37k · revenue -6%
  • CD
    CAROLINAS DISTRICT OF CIRCLE K INTERNATIONAL INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $21k

Funded once

  • KI
    KIWANIS INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2025 · $12k · revenue 0% · 36% of their budget
  • TK
    THE KIWANIS CLUB OF TRYON FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2025 · $12k
  • KC
    KIWANIS CLUB OF ASHEVILLE INC
    one grant, 2025 · $12k · revenue 0% · 36% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
1/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KEY CLUB INTERNATIONAL DBA CAROLINA'S DISTRICT OF KEY CLUB: $45,387 · OtherKEY CLUB INTERNATIONAL DBA CAROLINA'S DISTRICT OF KEY CLUBCAROLINAS DISTRICT OF CIRCLE K INTERNATIONAL INC: $20,802 · OtherCAROLINAS DISTRICT OF CIRCLE K INTERNATIONAL INCKIWANIS CLUB OF WAYNESVILLE CHARITABLE CORP: $18,283 · OtherKIWANIS CLUB OF WAYNESVILLE CHARITABLE CORPKIWANIS INTERNATIONAL INC: $11,783 · OtherKIWANIS INTERNATIONAL INCTHE KIWANIS CLUB OF TRYON FOUNDATION INC: $11,783 · OtherTHE KIWANIS CLUB OF TRYON FOUNDATION INCKIWANIS CLUB OF ASHEVILLE INC: $11,783 · OtherKIWANIS CLUB OF ASHEVILLE INCKIWANIS CLUB OF BLACK MOUNTAIN SWANNANOA FOUNDATION INC: $11,783 · OtherKIWANIS CLUB OF BLACK MOUNTAIN SWANNANOA FOUNDATION INCKIWANIS CLUB OF BANNER ELK FOUNDATION: $11,783 · OtherKIWANIS CLUB OF BANNER ELK FOUNDATIONKIWANIS INTERNATIONAL INC: $11,783 · OtherKIWANIS INTERNATIONAL INCRUTHERFORD KIWANIS FOUNDATION INC: $11,783 · OtherRUTHERFORD KIWANIS FOUNDATION INCTHE BOONE KIWANIS FOUNDATION INC: $11,783 · OtherTHE BOONE KIWANIS FOUNDATION INCBOYS & GIRLS HOMES OF NC INC: $36,627 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS HOMES …
Other$178,736Human Services$36,627

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKEY CLUB INTERNATIONAL DBA CAROLINA'S DISTRICT OF KEY CLUB: $45,387 over 3y, 14% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS HOMES OF NC INC: $36,627 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetKIWANIS INTERNATIONAL INC: $11,783 over 1y, 36% of budgetKIWANIS CLUB OF ASHEVILLE INC: $11,783 over 1y, 36% of budgetKIWANIS CLUB OF BLACK MOUNTAIN SWANNANOA FOUNDATION INC: $11,783 over 1y, 6.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carolinas District Kiwanis Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carolinas District Kiwanis Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Carolinas District Kiwanis Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Carolinas District Kiwanis Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Carolinas District Kiwanis’ filings →

    More from the funding graph