Skip to content

· Public charity

Capital Pride Alliance Inc

The capital pride alliance, inc.

$1.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$206k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 22 grants below total $877,766, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,352,363 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $474,597 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $306k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $556k
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTER FOR BLACK EQUITY$205,500
ASIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER QUEERS UNITED FOR ACTION DC$100,000
LATINO GLBT HISTORY PROJECT$90,000
INTERNATIONAL PRIDE ORCHESTRA$60,000
CRUSHING COLONIALISM$50,000
MODERN MILITARY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA$50,000
DIA DE LOS MUERTOS DC$37,500
SEABURY RESOURCES FOR AGING$37,000
DC PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION$30,000
THEATER ALLIANCE OF WASHINGTON DC$30,000
THEATRE WASHINGTON$25,000
SMYAL$25,000
DUPONT UNDERGROUND$22,500
WOOLLY MAMMOTH THEATRE COMPANY$20,000
ADVOCATES FOR YOUTH$16,646
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $62k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SEABURY RESOURCES FOR AGING: $37k → 14%SMYAL: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Parity Productions Inc
Arts & Culture
2
Capital Pride Alliance Inc

The capital pride alliance, inc. (capital pride), through its diverse planning and stewardship of the lgbtq+ organizations and events, specifically year-round pride festivities and programs in washington dc, will serve to celebrate,…

Human Services
3
National Queer Theater

National Queer Theater produces new theatrical works by, for, and with LGBTQ+ communities. Key programming includes the annual Criminal Queerness Festival and the Staging Pride youth arts education program. National Queer Theater engages…

Arts & Culture
4
Austin Rainbow Theatre

Austin Rainbow Theatre provides affordable theatre that focuses on creating belonging, reducing stigma, honoring diverse LGBTQIA+ history and stories, and amplifying LGBTQIA+ artist and community voices.

Arts & Culture
5
Out & Equal

To provide leadership and professional development, education and research to create workplaces free from discrimination.

Social Science
6
Seattle Out and Proud Inc

To coordinate and promote lesbian gay bisexual and transgender pride events in Seattle and the Pacific Northwest which celebrate the present envision the future and honor the past.

Arts & Culture
7
Washington Ensemble Theatre

Through collaborative artistic leadership, Washington Ensemble Theatre fearlessly creates audacious stories for adventurous Seattle audiences.

Arts & Culture
8
Metro Dc Community Center Inc

The dc lgbt center educates, empowers, celebrates, and connects the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender communities. to fulfill our mission, we focus on four core areas: health and wellness, arts & culture, social & support services,…

Human Services
9
Greater Seattle Business Association

To combine business development, leadership and social action to expand economic opportunities for the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer community and those who support equality for all.

Community Improvement
10
Richmond Triangle Players Inc

Richmond Triangle Players is the leading performing arts company in the mid-Atlantic region producing high-quality transformational programming rooted in LGBTQ+ experiences, supporting and celebrating the development of queer artistry.

Arts & Culture
11
Dc Theater Arts Collaborative

The DC Theater Arts Collaborative provides financial and other assistance to small and emerging nonprofit theater companies in the Washington DC metropolitan area and elsewhere. Its goal is to provide a home for the arts in Washington DC…

—
12
District of Columbia Arts Center

The District of Columbia Arts Center serves the Washington DC area by presenting high caliber and challenging works. It encourages professionalism among artists by providing a forum for educational and cultural exchange. DCAC was founded…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Theatrewashington; the most unlike its peers is Cbe-Pride. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
8/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CBE-PRIDE: $205,500 · Human ServicesCBE-PRIDESeabury Resources for Aging: $37,000 · Human ServicesSeabury Resources for AgingSMYAL Inc: $25,000 · Human ServicesSMYAL IncLATINO GLBT HISTORY PROJECT: $90,000 · OtherLATINO GLBT HISTORY PROJECTINTERNATIONAL PRIDE ORCHESTRA: $60,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL PRIDE ORCHESTR…THEATREWASHINGTON: $25,000 · OtherTHEATREWASHINGTONADVOCATES FOR YOUTH: $16,646 · OtherADVOCATES FOR YOUTHQUEER FILM INSTITUTE: $15,000 · OtherQUEER FILM INSTITUTEWASHINGTON IMPROVISATIONAL THEATER COMPANY: $10,455 · OtherEDLAVITCH JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF WASHINGTON DC INC: $9,700 · OtherNational Queer Asian Pacific Islander Alliance Inc dba NQAPIA: $100,000 · Civil RightsNational Queer Asia…Modern Military Association of America: $50,000 · Civil RightsModern Military Ass…CRUSHING COLONIALISM INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureCRUSHING COLONI…Theater Alliance of Washington DC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureTheater Allianc…DCENTER INC: $22,500 · Arts & CultureDCENTER INCWoolly Mammoth Theatre Company Inc: $20,000 · Arts & CultureWoolly Mammoth …DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $67,500 · EducationDISTRICT OF C…TEAM DC INC: $25,465 · EducationTEAM DC INCINTERPRIDE: $10,000 · EducationINTERPRIDEADAMS MORGAN PARTNERSHIP INC: $11,000 · Community ImprovementSTATE DEMOCRACY PROJECT: $7,000 · Public Benefit
Human Services$267,500Other$226,801Civil Rights$150,000Arts & Culture$122,500Education$102,965Community Improvement$11,000Public Benefit$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSeabury Resources for Aging: $37,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTheater Alliance of Washington DC: $30,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetTEAM DC INC: $25,465 over 3y, 12% of budgetWoolly Mammoth Theatre Company Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetADVOCATES FOR YOUTH: $16,646 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetADAMS MORGAN PARTNERSHIP INC: $11,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWASHINGTON IMPROVISATIONAL THEATER COMPANY: $10,455 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetINTERPRIDE: $10,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetEDLAVITCH JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF WASHINGTON DC INC: $9,700 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Capital Pride Alliance Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Capital Pride Alliance Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–23
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Capital Pride Alliance’s filings →

    More from the funding graph