Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cantigny Research Foundation

This foundation was established to engage in the continuous conduct of medical research by means of experiments and studies to discover and develop information pertaining to the causes, diagnosis, treatments,prevention and control of physical disease in its initial years.

$184k
Granted FY2022
9
Grants FY2022
5
States reached
$51k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2022.

Health$148kEducation$47kRecreation & Sports$1kReligion$500Animals$300
02FY2022 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k3 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $130k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW YORK MEDICAL COLLEGE$51,000
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK$45,000
CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER$30,000
NCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM$25,000
EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK$20,000
CANCER SUPPORT OF ATLANTA$10,000
FOUNDATION COLLIER COUNTY MEDICAL S$2,000
FREEDOM WATERS FOUNDATION$1,000
GULF COAST POODLE CLUB$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 45% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%MASS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $5k → 16%EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK: $20k → 22%CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $30k → 14%NY CANCER FUND RAISER: $250 → 7%NEW YORK MEDICAL COLLEGE: $51k → 9%GULF COAST POODLE CLUB: $200 → 10%ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $500 → 11%CANCER SUPPORT OF ATLANTA: $10k → 13%RIVER OF LIFE FOUR SQUARE CHURCH: $500 → 16%GULF COAST POODLE CLUB: $100 → 10%CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY OF ATLANTA: $1k → 13%NCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM: $25k → 10%CANCER SUPPORT OF ATLANTA: $1k → 13%FOUNDATION COLLIER COUNTY MEDICAL S: $2k → 10%FOUNDATION COLLIER COUNTY MEDICAL S: $2k → 10%FREEDOM WATERS FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

32%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$62k · 4 repeat orgs$134k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
5

Total granted

$62k
$7k

Still filing today

0%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $127k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22
HealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
    2× · 2021–2022 · $47k
  • CS
    CANCER SUPPORT OF ATLANTA
    2× · 2021–2022 · $11k
  • FC
    FOUNDATION COLLIER COUNTY MEDICAL S
    2× · 2021–2022 · $4k

Funded once

  • MG
    MASS GENERAL HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • CS
    Cancer Support Community - Atlanta Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +12%
  • AA
    ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2021 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW YORK MEDICAL COLLEGE: $51,000 · OtherNEW YORK MEDICAL COLLEGETHE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK: $47,000 · OtherTHE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORKEINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK: $20,000 · OtherEINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORKCANCER SUPPORT OF ATLANTA: $11,000 · OtherCANCER SUPPORT OF ATLANTAMASS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $5,000 · Other+5 more: $5,550 · OtherCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $30,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTERNCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC: $25,000 · HealthNCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC+1 more: $1,000 · HealthFreedom Waters Foundation Inc: $1,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$139,550Health$56,000Recreation & Sports$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW YORK MEDICAL COLLEGE: $51,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFreedom Waters Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCancer Support Community - Atlanta Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW YORK MEDICAL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds Freedom Waters Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Cancer Support Community - Atlanta Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cantigny Research Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cantigny Research Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cantigny Research’s filings →

    More from the funding graph